Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35143490›Full record

ArticlePLoS neglected tropical diseases2022

Scaling-up the delivery of dog vaccination campaigns against rabies in Tanzania.

Maganga Sambo, Elaine A Ferguson, Bernadette Abela-Ridder, Joel Changalucha, Sarah Cleaveland, Kennedy Lushasi, Geofrey Joseph Mchau, Alphoncina Nanai, Hezron Nonga, Rachel Steenson and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS neglected tropical diseases, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
3.2field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 46 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 6 institutions in 3 countries.

Maganga SamboEnvironmental Health and Ecological Sciences Department, Ifakara Health Institute, Ifakara, Tanzania.ORCID 0000-0002-7350-1143
Elaine A FergusonBoyd Orr Centre for Population and Ecosystem Health, Institute of Biodiversity, Animal Health and Comparative Medicine, College of Medical, Veterinary and Life Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0003-2010-765X
Bernadette Abela-RidderDepartment of the Control of Neglected Tropical Diseases, Geneva, Switzerland.
Joel ChangaluchaEnvironmental Health and Ecological Sciences Department, Ifakara Health Institute, Ifakara, Tanzania.ORCID 0000-0003-0758-2480
Sarah CleavelandBoyd Orr Centre for Population and Ecosystem Health, Institute of Biodiversity, Animal Health and Comparative Medicine, College of Medical, Veterinary and Life Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, United Kingdom.
Kennedy LushasiEnvironmental Health and Ecological Sciences Department, Ifakara Health Institute, Ifakara, Tanzania.ORCID 0000-0002-2060-4202
Geofrey Joseph MchauMinistry of Health, Community Development, Gender, Elderly and Children, Dodoma, Tanzania.ORCID 0000-0002-4640-0486
Alphoncina NanaiDepartment of Neglected Tropical Diseases, World Health Organization, Country Office of Tanzania, Dar es Salaam, Tanzania.
Hezron NongaDirectorate of Veterinary Services, Ministry of Livestock Development and Fisheries, Dodoma, Tanzania.ORCID 0000-0002-7204-9001
Rachel SteensonBoyd Orr Centre for Population and Ecosystem Health, Institute of Biodiversity, Animal Health and Comparative Medicine, College of Medical, Veterinary and Life Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, United Kingdom.
Paul Cd JohnsonBoyd Orr Centre for Population and Ecosystem Health, Institute of Biodiversity, Animal Health and Comparative Medicine, College of Medical, Veterinary and Life Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0001-6663-7520
Katie HampsonBoyd Orr Centre for Population and Ecosystem Health, Institute of Biodiversity, Animal Health and Comparative Medicine, College of Medical, Veterinary and Life Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0001-5392-6884
Glasgow Centre for Population Health · GBIfakara Health Institute · TZDrugs for Neglected Diseases Initiative · CHInternational Institute of Tropical Agriculture · TZMinistry of Health, Community Development, Gender, Elderly and Children · TZMinistry of Livestock and Fisheries · TZ

Funding

Wellcome TrustWellcome Trust 095787/Z/11/ZWellcome Trust 207569/Z/17/ZWorld Health Organization 001
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

An increasing number of countries are committing to meet the global target to eliminate human deaths from dog-mediated rabies by 2030. Mass dog vaccination is central to this strategy. To interrupt rabies transmission from dogs to humans, the World Health Organization recommends that vaccination campaigns should be carried out every year in all dog-owning communities vaccinating 70% of their susceptible dogs. Monitoring and evaluation of dog vaccination campaigns are needed to measure progress towards elimination. In this study, we measured the delivery performance of large-scale vaccination campaigns implemented in 25 districts in south-east Tanzania from 2010 until 2017. We used regression modelling to infer the factors associated with, and potentially influencing the successful delivery of vaccination campaigns. During 2010-2017, five rounds of vaccination campaigns were carried out, vaccinating in total 349,513 dogs in 2,066 administrative vaccination units (rural villages or urban wards). Progressively more dogs were vaccinated over the successive campaigns. The campaigns did not reach all vaccination units each year, with only 16-28% of districts achieving 100% campaign completeness (where all units were vaccinated). During 2013-2017 when vaccination coverage was monitored, approximately 20% of vaccination units achieved the recommended 70% coverage, with average coverage around 50%. Campaigns were also not completed at annual intervals, with the longest interval between campaigns being 27 months. Our analysis revealed that districts with higher budgets generally achieved higher completeness, with a twofold difference in district budget increasing the odds of a vaccination unit being reached by a campaign by slightly more than twofold (OR: 2.29; 95% CI: 1.69-3.09). However, higher budgets did not necessarily result in higher coverage within vaccination units that were reached. We recommend national programs regularly monitor and evaluate the performance of their vaccination campaigns, so as to identify factors hindering their effective delivery and to guide remedial action.

Indexed as

AnimalsDog DiseasesDogsFemaleHealth PromotionLinear ModelsMaleRabiesRabies VaccinesRabies virusTanzaniaVaccinationRabies Vaccines

Identifiers

PMID35143490
PMCPMC8865671
OpenAlexW4211212645

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.