Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35143471›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of occupational medicine and environmental health2022

The role of probiotic intervention in regulating gut microbiota, short-chain fatty acids and depression-like behavior in lead-exposed rats.

Xiaojun Chen, Shujuan Meng, Yongli Yu, Shuang Li, Lei Wu, Yanshu Zhang

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of occupational medicine and environmental health, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Assessment of the beneficial effects ofFrontiers in neuroscience · 2026
    Article
  7. Emerging Nonthermal Technologies for the Production of Postbiotics.Comprehensive reviews in food science and food safety · 2025
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Suppressive Effects ofBiomedicines · 2023
    Article
  13. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Xiaojun ChenNorth China University of Science and Technology, Tangshan, China (School of Public Health).
Shujuan MengTangshan Hongci Hospital, Tangshan, China (Department of Pathology).
Yongli YuTangshan Hongci Hospital, Tangshan, China (Department of Pathology).
Shuang LiNorth China University of Science and Technology, Tangshan, China (Experimental Animal Center).
Lei WuNorth China University of Science and Technology, Tangshan, China (School of Public Health).
Yanshu ZhangNorth China University of Science and Technology, Tangshan, China (School of Public Health).
North China University of Science and Technology · CNTangshan People's Hospital · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesThe aim of this study was to observe the depression-like behavior changes of rats exposed to lead with or without probiotic intervention, and to investigate changes in the gut microbiota and fecal short-chain fatty acids (SCFAs) levels after lead exposure, and the possible functions of probiotics in this process. MATERIAL AND

methodsAdult male Sprague Dawley rats were exposed to a 300 mg/l lead acetate solution for 24 weeks, with or without probiotic (freeze-dried powder containing

resultsNeurobehavioral tests showed that lead exposure induced depression-like behavior in rats, including reduced sucrose preference in the SPT, and increased immobility times in the FST and the TST. Sequencing and gas chromatography showed that lead exposure changed the structure and the phylogenetic diversity of the gut microbiota, as well as significantly altered the levels of SCFAs. Moreover, the depression-like behaviors, and the changes in both gut microbiota and SCFAs, could be mitigated by probiotic intervention.

conclusionsLead exposure not only changes the structure and diversity of the gut microbiome but also affects metabolic function. Probiotic intervention may be a novel initiative for the prevention and treatment of neurological damage following lead exposure. Int J Occup Med Environ Health. 2022;35(1):95-106.

Indexed as

Gastrointestinal MicrobiomeProbioticsAnimalsDepressionFatty Acids, VolatileLeadMalePhylogenyRatsRats, Sprague-DawleyRNA, Ribosomal, 16SFatty Acids, VolatileLeadRNA, Ribosomal, 16Sdepressiongut microbiotalead exposureneurobehavioral testsprobioticSCFAs

Identifiers

PMID35143471
PMCPMC10464776
OpenAlexW4211075973

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.