ArticleInternational journal of cancer2022
Cancer in twin pairs discordant for smoking: The Nordic Twin Study of Cancer.
Article in International journal of cancer, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.
- Article
- The Association Between Religiosity and Lifelong Cancer Incidence in an Israeli Male Cohort: A Competing Risk Survival Analysis.Epidemiologia (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Pre-diagnosis blood DNA methylation profiling of twin pairs discordant for breast cancer points to the importance of environmental risk factors.Clinical epigenetics · 2024Article
- Genetic Liability to Cardiovascular Disease, Physical Activity, and Mortality: Findings from the Finnish Twin Cohort.Medicine and science in sports and exercise · 2024Article
- Cancer in twin pairs discordant for smoking: The Nordic Twin Study of Cancer.International journal of cancer · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 4 institutions in 4 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The discordant twin pair study design is powerful to control for familial confounding. We employed this approach to investigate the associations of smoking with several cancers. The NorTwinCan study combines data from the Danish, Finnish, Norwegian and Swedish twin and cancer registries. Follow-up started when smoking status was determined and ended at cancer diagnosis confirmed by information in the cancer registry, death or end of follow-up. We classified the participants as never (n = 59 093), former (n = 21 168) or current (n = 47 314) smokers. We pooled data from twin pairs where one co-twin was diagnosed with any of the following tobacco-related cancers: esophagus, kidney, larynx, liver, oral cavity, pancreas, pharynx or urinary bladder, while their co-twin had none of those. Lung cancer was included in further analysis. We used Cox regression allowing for pair-specific baseline functions to estimate hazard ratios (HRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). For tobacco-related cancer sites, we recorded 7379 cases during median 27 years of follow-up. The analyses based on individual twins showed that former (HR 1.31, 95% CI: 1.17-1.48) and current (HR 2.14 [1.95-2.34]) smokers are at increased risk to develop one of cancers listed above, compared to never smokers. Among 109 monozygotic twin pairs discordant for cancer and smoking, the HR was 1.85 (95% CI: 1.15-2.98) among current smokers and 1.69 (1.00-2.87) among former smokers when compared to their never smoking co-twin. Thus, associations of smoking with several cancers were replicated for discordant identical twin pairs. Analyses based on genetically informative data provide evidence consistent with smoking causing multiple cancers.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.