Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35143027›Full record

ArticleEuropean geriatric medicine2022

Detecting delirium in nursing home residents using the Informant Assessment of Geriatric Delirium (I-AGeD): a validation pilot study.

Pia Urfer Dettwiler, Franziska Zúñiga, Stefanie Bachnick, Beatrice Gehri, Jos F M de Jonghe, Wolfgang Hasemann

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European geriatric medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Delirium in Nursing Home Residents: A Narrative Review.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Pia Urfer DettwilerNursing Home Frenkenbündten, Gitterlistrasse 10, 4410, Liestal, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0002-3232-6414
Franziska ZúñigaInstitute of Nursing Science, University of Basel, Bernoullistrasse, 4056, Basel, Switzerland.
Stefanie BachnickInstitute of Nursing Science, University of Basel, Bernoullistrasse, 4056, Basel, Switzerland.
Beatrice GehriInstitute of Nursing Science, University of Basel, Bernoullistrasse, 4056, Basel, Switzerland.
Jos F M de JonghePrivate Practice, DC VerzuimDiagnostiek , Tesselschadestraat 4, 1054 ET, msterdam, The Netherlands.
Wolfgang HasemannUniversity Department of Geriatric Medicine FELIX PLATTER, Burgfelderstrasse 101, 4002, Basel, Switzerland. wolfgang.hasemann@felixplatter.ch.ORCID 0000-0003-2417-3785
University of Basel · CHFelix Platter-Hospital · CH

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeEarly delirium detection in nursing home residents is vital to prevent adverse outcomes. Despite the potential of structured delirium screening tools to enhance delirium detection, they are rarely used in nursing homes. To promote delirium screening tools in nursing homes, they should be easy to integrate into the daily routine of care workers. The I-AGeD, was developed as a simple and easily understandable tool to detect delirium in older adults. The aims of this study were to record the prevalence of delirium, to investigate the feasibility of the I-AGeD, and to compare these results with the DSM-5 as the reference standard.

methodsThis is a cross-sectional prospective single-center pilot study. Seven registered nurses assessed the participants with the I-AGeD. The research assistant conducted delirium assessments based on the DSM-5 criteria, to identify delirium symptoms for the same participants. The feasibility test was verified using a five-point Likert scale ranging from very easy to very difficult.

results85 nursing home residents participated in the study. A delirium prevalence of 5.9% was found. The sensitivity was 60% and specificity 94% at a cut point of ≥ 4 to indicate delirium. The feasibility test showed that the 10 items of the I-AGeD were easy or very easy to answer.

conclusionThe I-AGeD showed an acceptable performance to assess delirium in nursing home residents. Additionally, it was found feasible and due to its brevity the I-AGeD could easily be integrated into the routine of daily care in nursing homes.

Indexed as

DeliriumGeriatric AssessmentAgedCross-Sectional StudiesHumansNursing HomesPilot ProjectsProspective StudiesAgedDeliriumDelirium assessmentNursing homesValidation study

Identifiers

PMID35143027
PMCPMC9378321
OpenAlexW4211117066

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.