Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35142977›Full record

ArticleAnimal cognition2022

The acoustic bases of human voice identity processing in dogs.

Anna Gábor, Noémi Kaszás, Tamás Faragó, Paula Pérez Fraga, Melinda Lovas, Attila Andics

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Animal cognition, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Anna GáborMTA-ELTE "Lendület" Neuroethology of Communication Research Group, Hungarian Academy of Sciences - Eötvös Loránd University, 1/C Pázmány Péter sétány, Budapest, 1117, Hungary. annagabor33@gmail.com.
Noémi KaszásDepartment of Ethology, Eötvös Loránd University, 1/C Pázmány Péter sétány, Budapest, 1117, Hungary.
Tamás FaragóDepartment of Ethology, Eötvös Loránd University, 1/C Pázmány Péter sétány, Budapest, 1117, Hungary.
Paula Pérez FragaMTA-ELTE "Lendület" Neuroethology of Communication Research Group, Hungarian Academy of Sciences - Eötvös Loránd University, 1/C Pázmány Péter sétány, Budapest, 1117, Hungary.
Melinda LovasDepartment of Ethology, Eötvös Loránd University, 1/C Pázmány Péter sétány, Budapest, 1117, Hungary.
Attila AndicsMTA-ELTE "Lendület" Neuroethology of Communication Research Group, Hungarian Academy of Sciences - Eötvös Loránd University, 1/C Pázmány Péter sétány, Budapest, 1117, Hungary.

Funding

h2020 european research council 950159hungarian ministry for innovation and technology, national research, development and innovation fund ÚNKP-20-4-II-ELTE-286hungarian ministry for innovation and technology, national research, development and innovation fund ÚNKP-20-5-ELTE-337Hungarian Ministry for Innovation and Technology, National Research, Development and Innovation Fund ÚNKP-21-5-ELTE-1061magyar tudományos akadémia LP2017-13/2017mta bolyai research scholarship, hungary BO/751/20
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Speech carries identity-diagnostic acoustic cues that help individuals recognize each other during vocal-social interactions. In humans, fundamental frequency, formant dispersion and harmonics-to-noise ratio serve as characteristics along which speakers can be reliably separated. The ability to infer a speaker's identity is also adaptive for members of other species (like companion animals) for whom humans (as owners) are relevant. The acoustic bases of speaker recognition in non-humans are unknown. Here, we tested whether dogs can recognize their owner's voice and whether they rely on the same acoustic parameters for such recognition as humans use to discriminate speakers. Stimuli were pre-recorded sentences spoken by the owner and control persons, played through loudspeakers placed behind two non-transparent screens (with each screen hiding a person). We investigated the association between acoustic distance of speakers (examined along several dimensions relevant in intraspecific voice identification) and dogs' behavior. Dogs chose their owner's voice more often than that of control persons', suggesting that they can identify it. Choosing success and time spent looking in the direction of the owner's voice were positively associated, showing that looking time is an index of the ease of choice. Acoustic distance of speakers in mean fundamental frequency and jitter were positively associated with looking time, indicating that the shorter the acoustic distance between speakers with regard to these parameters, the harder the decision. So, dogs use these cues to discriminate their owner's voice from unfamiliar voices. These findings reveal that dogs use some but probably not all acoustic parameters that humans use to identify speakers. Although dogs can detect fine changes in speech, their perceptual system may not be fully attuned to identity-diagnostic cues in the human voice.

Indexed as

Speech PerceptionVoiceAcousticsAnimalsCuesDogsHumansRecognition, PsychologySpeech AcousticsAcousticsDogInterspecific voice discriminationSpeaker-sensitivity

Identifiers

PMID35142977
PMCPMC9334438

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.