Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35142974›Full record

ReviewCurrent oncology reports2022

Update on Management of Squamous Cell Esophageal Cancer.

John K Waters, Scott I Reznik

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Current oncology reports, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 154 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
154citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
46.4field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

154 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 223 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Observational
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. HighCancers · 2026
    Article
  20. Article

94 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

John K WatersDivision of Thoracic Surgery, Department of Cardiovascular and Thoracic Surgery, 5323 Harry Hines Boulevard, MC 8879, Dallas, TX, 75390-8879, USA.
Scott I ReznikDivision of Thoracic Surgery, Department of Cardiovascular and Thoracic Surgery, 5323 Harry Hines Boulevard, MC 8879, Dallas, TX, 75390-8879, USA. Scott.reznik@utsouthwestern.edu.
Southwestern Medical Center · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purpose of the reviewEsophageal cancer is the sixth most common cause of cancer death globally. Squamous cell carcinoma of the esophagus (ESCC) is the predominant histologic type in the world. Treatment strategies have evolved in the last decade and new paradigms are replacing traditional approaches at all stages of cancer. This review will summarize the epidemiology, diagnosis, staging, and treatment of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. RECENT

findingsNovel approaches to screening may be cost-effective in regions with a high incidence of ESCC. Multi-disciplinary evaluation and treatment has become the standard of care. Endoscopic resection may be an option for early stage ESCC. Minimally invasive esophagectomy can be performed safely as a primary therapy or after-induction chemoradiation. Several recent studies have found a survival benefit to immunotherapy for patients with metastatic or persistent disease. Multi-disciplinary evaluation and multi-modal therapy including cytotoxic chemotherapy, radiation, surgery, and immunotherapy have improved survival compared to surgery alone.

Indexed as

Esophageal NeoplasmsEsophageal Squamous Cell CarcinomaEpithelial CellsEsophagectomyHumansNeoadjuvant TherapyNeoplasm StagingRetrospective StudiesSurvival RateTreatment OutcomeCheckpoint inhibitorChemoradiationEsophageal cancerEsophageal cancer stagingNeoadjuvant therapySquamous cell carcinoma

Identifiers

PMID35142974
OpenAlexW4210987371

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.