Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35142966›Full record

ArticleAnnals of surgical oncology2022

The Impact of Surveillance Imaging Frequency on the Detection of Distant Disease for Patients with Resected Stage III Melanoma.

Mbathio Dieng, Sarah J Lord, Robin M Turner, Omgo E Nieweg, Alexander M Menzies, Robyn P M Saw, Andrew J Einstein, Louise Emmett, John F Thompson, Serigne N Lo and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of surgical oncology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Mbathio DiengNHMRC Clinical Trials Centre, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Camperdown, NSW, Australia. mbathio.dieng@sydney.edu.au.
Sarah J LordNHMRC Clinical Trials Centre, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Camperdown, NSW, Australia.
Robin M TurnerCentre for Biostatistics, University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand.
Omgo E NiewegMelanoma Institute Australia, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Alexander M MenziesMelanoma Institute Australia, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Robyn P M SawMelanoma Institute Australia, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Andrew J EinsteinSeymour, Paul, and Gloria Milstein Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, and Department of Radiology, Columbia University Irving Medical Center and New York-Presbyterian Hospital, New York, NY, USA.
Louise EmmettDepartment of Theranostics and Nuclear Medicine, St Vincent's Hospital Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
John F ThompsonMelanoma Institute Australia, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Serigne N LoMelanoma Institute Australia, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Rachael L MortonNHMRC Clinical Trials Centre, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Camperdown, NSW, Australia.

Funding

Cancer Australia, Priority-driven Collaborative Cancer Research Scheme gran 1129568National Health and Medical Research Council 1135285National Health and Medical Research Council 1150989
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIt is not known whether there is a survival benefit associated with more frequent surveillance imaging in patients with resected American Joint Committee on Cancer stage III melanoma.

objectiveThe aim of this study was to investigate distant disease-free survival (DDFS), melanoma-specific survival (MSS), post distant recurrence MSS (dMSS), and overall survival for patients with resected stage III melanoma undergoing regular computed tomography (CT) or positron emission tomography (PET)/CT surveillance imaging at different intervals. PATIENTS AND

methodsA closely followed longitudinal cohort of patients with resected stage IIIA-D disease treated at a tertiary referral center underwent 3- to 4-monthly, 6-monthly, or 12-monthly surveillance imaging between 2000 and 2017. Survival outcomes were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method, and log-rank tests assessed the significance of survival differences between imaging frequency groups.

resultsOf 473 patients (IIIA, 19%; IIIB, 31%; IIIC, 49%; IIID, 1%) 30% underwent 3- to 4-monthly imaging, 10% underwent 6-monthly imaging, and 60% underwent 12-monthly imaging. After a median follow-up of 6.2 years, distant recurrence was recorded in 252 patients (53%), with 40% detected by surveillance CT or PET/CT, 43% detected clinically, and 17% with another imaging modality. Median DDFS was 5.1 years (95% confidence interval 3.9-6.6). Among 139 IIIC patients who developed distant disease, the median dMSS was 4.4 months shorter in those who underwent 3- to 4-monthly imaging than those who underwent 12-monthly imaging.

conclusionSelecting patients at higher risk of distant recurrence for more frequent surveillance imaging yields a higher proportion of imaging-detected distant recurrences but is not associated with improved survival. A randomized comparison of low versus high frequency imaging is needed.

Indexed as

MelanomaSkin NeoplasmsChronic DiseaseCutaneous Malignant MelanomaHumansNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalNeoplasm StagingPositron Emission Tomography Computed Tomography

Identifiers

PMID35142966
PMCPMC8990943

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.