ArticleExperimental & applied acarology2022
In vitro evaluation of the response of Dermanyssus gallinae to products in aqueous suspension.
Article in Experimental & applied acarology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- Challenges ofInsects · 2025Review
- Advances in Non-Chemical Tools to Control Poultry Hematophagous Mites.Veterinary sciences · 2023Review
- Challenges in the Biological Control of Pests in Poultry Production: a Critical Review of Advances in Brazil.Neotropical entomology · 2023Review
- In Vitro Acaricidal Activity of Silver Nanoparticles (AgNPs) against the Poultry Red Mite (Pharmaceutics · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The hematophagous mite Dermanyssus gallinae poses a serious sanitary problem in the Brazilian laying poultry industry. Its control is typically performed with acaricides, either in powder or liquid form. However, the intensive use of these products has caused populations of this species to develop tolerance and even resistance. The aim of the present study is to evaluate the response of eggs and adults of D. gallinae to products in aqueous suspension according to commercial indication and as per the recommendations of the Brazilian Ministry of Agriculture, Livestock and Supply. The study used four acaricide products (product 1: cypermethrin, chlorpyrifos, and piperonyl butoxide; product 2: alkyl-benzyl-dimethyl ammonium chloride, glutaraldehyde, deltamethrin; product 3: dichlorvos; product 4: fluralaner) tested in vitro using the contact method. Distilled water was used in the control group. The effectiveness of each of the products differed significantly between eggs and adults. Products 2, 3, and 4 caused 100% of adult mortality up to day 5 after start of treatment, product 1 97.5%. The corrected mortality (non-viability) of eggs was 21.4% (product 1) 39.4% (product 2), 47.8% (product 3), and 14.4% (product 4). Although the products evaluated were effective against adults of D. gallinae, their effectiveness against eggs was lower under the same conditions. This finding might be directly related to frequent D. gallinae reinfestations in poultry houses.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.