Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35142948›Full record

ArticleCognitive processing2022

Visual-auditory interactions on explicit and implicit information processing.

L Y Lo, C C Lai

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Cognitive processing, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

L Y LoDepartment of Counselling and Psychology, Hong Kong Shue Yan University, 10 Wai Tsui Crescent, Braemar Hill Road, North Point, Hong Kong, China. lylo@hksyu.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0177-9533
C C LaiDepartment of Counselling and Psychology, Hong Kong Shue Yan University, 10 Wai Tsui Crescent, Braemar Hill Road, North Point, Hong Kong, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Interactions among sensory information are important for generating a coherent percept of the external world. Facilitation and inhibition effects in cross-modal perception have been widely studied for decades. The present study tried to confirm the interaction effects between sensory information in a bimodal context and explore these influences when part of the sensory information was presented without participants' subjective awareness. A total of 40 undergraduate participants were recruited in this mixed design study. Participants were required to count the flashing of the black circle (visual task) or the presentation frequency of the beep sound (auditory task) with the presence of either congruent or incongruent sensory signals in the background. Participants in the explicit group generally performed more accurately and also faster with the congruent stimuli than with the incongruent stimuli. Performance accuracy in the visual task in the implicit group was affected by the non-target sound signals which were presented beneath participants' subjective awareness. The better performance yielded in the auditory task than in the visual task was explained by the appropriateness of the auditory stimulation to the task nature. In addition, the supportive findings regarding processing without awareness should be interpreted with caution.

Indexed as

CognitionVisual PerceptionAcoustic StimulationAuditory PerceptionHumansPhotic StimulationReaction TimeAuditoryCongruencyExplicitImplicitVisual

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.