Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35142938›Full record

ReviewBreast cancer research and treatment2022

Endocrine adherence in male versus female breast cancer: a seer-medicare review.

Azka Ali, Zhigang Xie, Laura Stanko, Edward De Leo, Young-Rock Hong, Jiang Bian, Karen C Daily

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Breast cancer research and treatment, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Azka AliDivision of Hematology and Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA.
Zhigang XieDivision of Hematology & Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Florida, 1600 SW Archer Road, M401, Gainesville, FL, 32610, USA.
Laura StankoDivision of Hematology and Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA.
Edward De LeoDivision of Hematology & Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Florida, 1600 SW Archer Road, M401, Gainesville, FL, 32610, USA. Edward.deleo@medicine.ufl.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1680-1705
Young-Rock HongUniversity of Florida Health Cancer Center, Gainesville, FL, USA.
Jiang BianUniversity of Florida Health Cancer Center, Gainesville, FL, USA.
Karen C DailyDivision of Hematology and Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA.
University of Florida Health · USUniversity of Florida · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeBreast cancer in men (BC-M) is almost exclusively hormone receptor positive. We conducted a large review of the SEER-Medicare linked database to compare endocrine therapy adherence, discontinuation, and survival outcomes of male versus female patients with breast cancer.

methodsStudy data were obtained through the SEER-Medicare linked database. The study included patients age ≥ 65 years-old diagnosed with breast cancer between 2007 and 2015. The primary endpoints were rates of adherence and discontinuation of endocrine therapy (ET). Adherence was defined as a gap of less than 90 days in-between consecutive Medicare prescriptions. Discontinuation was defined as a gap of greater than 12 months in-between Medicare prescriptions. Secondary endpoint was the association of use of ET with overall survival (OS).

resultsOf the 363 male patients on ET, 214 patients (59.0%) were adherent to the therapy, and 149 patients (41.0%) were nonadherent. Of the 20,722 females on ET, 10,752 (51.9%) were adherent to the therapy, and 9970 (48.1%) were nonadherent. 39 male patients (10.7%) discontinued therapy, while 324 (89.3%) did not discontinue therapy. 1849 female patients (8.9%) discontinued therapy, while 18,873 (91.1%) patients did not. Men were significantly more adherent than women (p = 0.008), but there was no significant difference in discontinuation among men and women (p = 0.228). Survival was significantly improved in both men (HR 0.77, 95% CI 0.60-0.99, p = 0.039) and women (HR 0.84, 95% CI 0.81-0.87, p < 0.001) on ET.

conclusionIdentification of contributing factors impacting adherence and discontinuation is needed to allow physicians to address barriers to long term use of ET.

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsAgedAntineoplastic Agents, HormonalFemaleHumansMaleMedicareMedication AdherenceSEER ProgramUnited StatesAntineoplastic Agents, HormonalEndocrine therapyMale breast cancerSEER Review

Identifiers

PMID35142938
OpenAlexW4211221201

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.