Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35142909›Full record

ReviewBrain structure & function2022

A hands-on tutorial on network and topological neuroscience.

Eduarda Gervini Zampieri Centeno, Giulia Moreni, Chris Vriend, Linda Douw, Fernando Antônio Nóbrega Santos

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Brain structure & function, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed
6.6field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 47 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Eduarda Gervini Zampieri CentenoAmsterdam Neuroscience, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Anatomy and Neurosciences, Amsterdam UMC, De Boelelaan 1117, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1490-4903
Giulia MoreniAmsterdam Neuroscience, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Anatomy and Neurosciences, Amsterdam UMC, De Boelelaan 1117, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Chris VriendAmsterdam Neuroscience, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Anatomy and Neurosciences, Amsterdam UMC, De Boelelaan 1117, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3111-1304
Linda DouwAmsterdam Neuroscience, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Anatomy and Neurosciences, Amsterdam UMC, De Boelelaan 1117, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7058-4062
Fernando Antônio Nóbrega SantosAmsterdam Neuroscience, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Anatomy and Neurosciences, Amsterdam UMC, De Boelelaan 1117, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. f.nobregasantos@amsterdamumc.nl.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6403-8396
Amsterdam Neuroscience · NLCentre National de la Recherche Scientifique · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The brain is an extraordinarily complex system that facilitates the optimal integration of information from different regions to execute its functions. With the recent advances in technology, researchers can now collect enormous amounts of data from the brain using neuroimaging at different scales and from numerous modalities. With that comes the need for sophisticated tools for analysis. The field of network neuroscience has been trying to tackle these challenges, and graph theory has been one of its essential branches through the investigation of brain networks. Recently, topological data analysis has gained more attention as an alternative framework by providing a set of metrics that go beyond pairwise connections and offer improved robustness against noise. In this hands-on tutorial, our goal is to provide the computational tools to explore neuroimaging data using these frameworks and to facilitate their accessibility, data visualisation, and comprehension for newcomers to the field. We will start by giving a concise (and by no means complete) overview of the field to introduce the two frameworks and then explain how to compute both well-established and newer metrics on resting-state functional magnetic resonance imaging. We use an open-source language (Python) and provide an accompanying publicly available Jupyter Notebook that uses the 1000 Functional Connectomes Project dataset. Moreover, we would like to highlight one part of our notebook dedicated to the realistic visualisation of high order interactions in brain networks. This pipeline provides three-dimensional (3-D) plots of pairwise and higher-order interactions projected in a brain atlas, a new feature tailor-made for network neuroscience.

Indexed as

ConnectomeBrainMagnetic Resonance ImagingNerve NetNeuroimagingBrain networksGraph theoryNetwork analysisNeurosciencePythonTopological data analysis

Identifiers

PMID35142909
PMCPMC8930803
OpenAlexW4220810573

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.