ArticleZeitschrift fur Rheumatologie2024
Relative remission rates of Janus kinase inhibitors in comparison with adalimumab in patients with active rheumatoid arthritis: a network meta-analysis.
Article in Zeitschrift fur Rheumatologie, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.
- Quality of Systematic Reviews with Network Meta-Analyses on JAK Inhibitors in the Treatment of Rheumatoid Arthritis: Application of the AMSTAR 2 Scale.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
- Filgotinib Radiographic and Clinical Efficacy Versus Other JAK Inhibitors and Adalimumab in Patients With Rheumatoid Arthritis and Inadequate Response to Methotrexate: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis.Rheumatology and therapy · 2025Review
- Comparison of Efficacy and Safety of Original and Biosimilar Adalimumab in Active Rheumatoid Arthritis in a Real-World National Cohort.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2022Observational
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesThe relative remission rates of tofacitinib, baricitinib, upadacitinib, and filgotinib compared with those of adalimumab were assessed in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) who responded poorly to methotrexate (MTX).
methodsWe performed a Bayesian network meta-analysis to combine direct and indirect evidence from randomized controlled trials (RCTs) to examine the Disease Activity Score in 28 joints with C‑reactive protein (DAS28-CRP), the Clinical Disease Activity Index (CDAI), the Simplified Disease Activity Index (SDAI), and the Boolean remission of tofacitinib, baricitinib, upadacitinib, filgotinib, and adalimumab in RA patients with inadequate responses to MTX.
resultsFour RCTs, comprising 3507 patients, met the inclusion criteria. The filgotinib 200 mg + MTX and upadacitinib 15 mg + MTX groups showed a significantly higher DAS28-CRP < 2.6 than adalimumab 40 mg + MTX. Upadacitinib 15 mg + MTX showed a significantly higher CDAI (≤ 2.8) than adalimumab 40 mg + MTX (odds ratio [OR]: 1.62; 95% credible interval [CrI]: 1.16-2.29). The ranking probability based on the surface under the cumulative ranking curve (SUCRA) indicated that upadacitinib 15 mg + MTX had the highest probability of being the best treatment as it achieved a CDAI ≤ 2.8, followed by filgotinib 200 mg + MTX, baricitinib 4 mg + MTX, tofacitinib 5 mg + MTX, and adalimumab 40 mg + MTX. The Boolean remission showed the same distribution pattern as that of the CDAI ≤ 2.8. Upadacitinib 15 mg + MTX showed a significantly higher SDAI ≤ 3.3 than adalimumab 40 mg + MTX (OR: 1.62; 95% CrI: 1.16-2.28). SUCRA ranking based on SDAI ≤ 3.3 indicated that upadacitinib 15 mg + MTX had the highest probability of being the best treatment for achieving an SDAI ≤ 3.3, followed by baricitinib 4 mg + MTX, filgotinib 200 mg + MTX, tofacitinib 5 mg + MTX, and adalimumab 40 mg + MTX.
conclusionsIn RA patients with an inadequate response to MTX, remission rates with JAK inhibitors were significantly higher; there is evidence for differences in efficacy regarding remission among the different JAK inhibitors.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.