Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35142859›Full record

ArticlePlant physiology2021

Deep dive into CO2-dependent molecular mechanisms driving stomatal responses in plants.

Guillaume Dubeaux, Po-Kai Hsu, Paulo H O Ceciliato, Kelsey J Swink, Wouter-Jan Rappel, Julian I Schroeder

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Plant physiology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Distinct guard cell-specific remodeling of chromatin accessibility during abscisic acid- and COProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2023
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Effects of Heavy Metals on Stomata in Plants: A Review.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Elevated COThe New phytologist · 2022
    Article
  10. Elevated COBiology · 2022
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Boolean modelling in plant biology.Quantitative plant biology · 2022
    Review
  13. Enriched COPlants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Guillaume DubeauxDivision of Biological Sciences, Cell and Developmental Biology Section, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, California 92093-0116, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-0275-8467
Po-Kai HsuDivision of Biological Sciences, Cell and Developmental Biology Section, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, California 92093-0116, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-7265-7077
Paulo H O CeciliatoDivision of Biological Sciences, Cell and Developmental Biology Section, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, California 92093-0116, USA.
Kelsey J SwinkDivision of Biological Sciences, Cell and Developmental Biology Section, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, California 92093-0116, USA.
Wouter-Jan RappelPhysics Department, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, California 92093-0116, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-3833-7197
Julian I SchroederDivision of Biological Sciences, Cell and Developmental Biology Section, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, California 92093-0116, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-3283-5972

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as

ArabidopsisArabidopsis ProteinsCarbon DioxidePlant StomataPoaceaeSignal TransductionArabidopsis ProteinsCarbon Dioxide

Identifiers

PMID35142859
PMCPMC8644143

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.