Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35142622›Full record

ArticleJMIR cancer2022

Clinicians' Perceptions of the Benefits and Challenges of Teleoncology as Experienced Through the COVID-19 Pandemic: Qualitative Study.

Jordan M Alpert, Greenberry Taylor, Chelsea N Hampton, Samantha Paige, Merry Jennifer Markham, Carma L Bylund

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR cancer, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Tele-Oncology Use During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Patient Experiences and Communication Behaviors with Clinicians.Telemedicine journal and e-health : the official journal of the American Telemedicine Association · 2024
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Jordan M AlpertCollege of Journalism and Communications, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7066-4748
Greenberry TaylorDepartment of Communication, Flagler College, Saint Augustine, FL, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6401-1388
Chelsea N HamptonCollege of Journalism and Communications, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9699-4702
Samantha PaigeCollege of Journalism and Communications, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6141-5099
Merry Jennifer MarkhamDivision of Hematology & Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3567-3494
Carma L BylundDepartment of Health Outcomes & Biomedical Informatics, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9335-1496

Funding

Using social networks to map and evaluate team science across CTSA hubsUL1TR001427 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA · PI MITCHELL, DUANE A. · 2015 to 2024
$37.2M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR001427
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCOVID-19 thrust both patients and clinicians to use telemedicine in place of traditional in-person visits. Prepandemic, limited research had examined clinician-patient communication in telemedicine visits. The shift to telemedicine in oncology, or teleoncology, has placed attention on how the technology can be utilized to provide care for patients with cancer.

objectiveOur objective was to describe oncology clinicians' experiences with teleoncology and to uncover its benefits and challenges during the first 10 months of the COVID-19 pandemic.

methodsIn-depth, semistructured qualitative interviews were conducted with oncology clinicians. Using an inductive, thematic approach, the most prevalent themes were identified.

resultsIn total, 21 interviews with oncology clinicians revealed the following themes: benefits of teleoncology, such as (1) reducing patients' travel time and expenses, (2) limiting COVID-19 exposure, and (3) enabling clinicians to "see" a patients' lifestyle and environment, and challenges, such as (1) technological connection difficulties, (2) inability to physically examine patients, and (3) patients' frustration related to clinicians being late to teleoncology appointments.

conclusionsTeleoncology has many benefits and is well suited for specific types of appointments. Challenges could be addressed through improved communication when scheduling appointments to make patients aware about what to expect. Ensuring patients have the proper technology to participate in teleoncology and an understanding about how it functions are necessary.

Indexed as

cancercancer careCOVID-19digital healthoncologypandemicqualitativetelehealthtelemedicineteleoncology

Identifiers

PMID35142622
PMCPMC8914732

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.