ReviewThe British journal of radiology2023
Spectrum of Ovarian Incidentalomas: Diagnosis and Management.
Review in The British journal of radiology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Comparison of Frozen Section and Final Pathology Results in Borderline Ovarian Tumors: A Retrospective Cohort Study.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Multimodal Deep Learning Based on Ultrasound Images and Clinical Data for Better Ovarian Cancer Diagnosis.Journal of imaging informatics in medicine · 2026Article
- Case Report of a Large Ovarian Cyst in a Multiparous Woman: A Challenging Surgical Management.Case reports in obstetrics and gynecology · 2026Article
- Rare Intraoperative Presentation of a Coexistent Uterine Cystic Mass and Bilateral Ovarian Cystic Masses.Cureus · 2026Article
- Large animal models in gynecology: status and future perspectives.Frontiers in veterinary science · 2025Review
- Article
- Incidental imaging findings from head to toe: challenges and management: introductory editorial.The British journal of radiology · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Incidental ovarian lesions are asymptomatic lesions that are accidentally discovered during a CT or MRI examinations that involves the pelvic cavity or during a routine obstetric ultrasound study. Incidental ovarian masses are usually benign with a very low risk of malignancy yet underlying malignant pathology may be discovered during the diagnostic work-up of these lesions. Suspicion of malignancy is directly correlating with the increase in the patient's age, the increase in the size of the lesion, the presence of the solid components or thick septa and a high color scale of the ovarian mass. Following standard reporting and management protocols are essential to choose the proper work-up of these lesions to avoid unnecessary additional imaging and operative intervention. In this article, we will provide a review of the characteristic imaging features of some incidental and yet commonly encountered ovarian lesions. We will also summarize the recently published algorithms that are important for consistent reporting and standard management of these lesions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.