Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35142091›Full record

Trial reportCancer medicine2022

Impact of early palliative care according to baseline symptom severity: Secondary analysis of a cluster-randomized controlled trial in patients with advanced cancer.

Rebecca Rodin, Nadia Swami, Ashley Pope, David Hui, Breffni Hannon, Lisa W Le, Camilla Zimmermann

Open access · goldAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Cancer medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
10.2field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 56 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Symptom screening with Targeted Early Palliative care (STEP) versus usual care for patients with advanced cancer: a mixed methods study.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2023
    Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Timing and outcomes of outpatient palliative care consultations in advanced cancer.Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2026
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Palliative Care Integration in Oncology: A Review and Update.Journal of hospice and palliative care · 2025
    Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Precision Palliative Care as a Pragmatic Solution for a Care Delivery Problem.Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology · 2023
    Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Rebecca RodinDepartment of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Nadia SwamiDepartment of Supportive Care, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Ashley PopeDepartment of Supportive Care, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
David HuiDepartment of Palliative Care, Rehabilitation, and Integrative Medicine, and Department of General Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-2733-6607
Breffni HannonDepartment of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-0881-555X
Lisa W LeDepartment of Biostatistics, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Camilla ZimmermannDepartment of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.ORCID 0000-0003-4889-0244
University Health Network · CAThe University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center · US

Funding

CIHR 152996
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundEarly palliative care (EPC) improves the quality of life but may not be feasible for all patients with advanced cancer. Symptom screening has been suggested to triage patients for EPC, but scant evidence exists for this practice.

methodsWe conducted a subgroup analysis of a cluster-randomized controlled trial of EPC vs. standard oncology care according to patients' baseline symptom scores (high [>23] vs. low [≤23] Edmonton Symptom Assessment System Distress Score [ESAS SDS]). A linear mixed-effects model was used to account for correlation within clusters, adjusting for the baseline outcome score and all covariates in the original trial.

resultsAmong the 461 participants, baseline symptom scores were high in 229 patients (127 intervention, 102 control) and low in 232 (101 intervention and 131 control). Among those with high baseline symptoms, there was improved quality of life in the EPC arm compared to controls at 4 months (adjusted difference in primary outcome of FACIT-Sp change score [95% CI], 8.7 [2.8 to 14.5], p = 0.01; adjusted difference in QUAL-E, 4.2 [0.9-7.5], p = 0.02); there was also improved satisfaction with care (6.9 [3.8-9.9], p = 0.001) and clinician-patient interactions (-1.7 [-3.4 to -0.1], p = 0.04), but no significant difference in ESAS SDS (-5.6 [-12.7 to 1.4], p = 0.11). In the low baseline symptom group, there were no significant differences between arms for any outcomes.

conclusionEPC improved quality of life, satisfaction with care, and clinician-patient interactions only in those with high baseline symptoms. Symptom severity may be an appropriate criterion to trigger early referrals to palliative care.

Indexed as

NeoplasmsPalliative CareHumansMass ScreeningQuality of LifeReferral and Consultationcancerpalliative carequality of liferandomized controlled trialsecondary analysissymptom assessment

Identifiers

PMID35142091
PMCPMC9041071
OpenAlexW4211109998

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.