Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35142038›Full record

SynthesisAlzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association2022

Mechanisms of motoric cognitive risk-Hypotheses based on a systematic review and meta-analysis of longitudinal cohort studies of older adults.

Donncha S Mullin, Alastair Cockburn, Miles Welstead, Michelle Luciano, Tom C Russ, Graciela Muniz-Terrera

Open access · hybridAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 34 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
34citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
6.3field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

34 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 45 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Donncha S MullinAlzheimer Scotland Dementia Research Centre, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-1679-8067
Alastair CockburnNHS Lothian, Royal Edinburgh Hospital, Edinburgh, UK.
Miles WelsteadLothian Birth Cohorts, Department of Psychology, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.
Michelle LucianoLothian Birth Cohorts, Department of Psychology, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.
Tom C RussAlzheimer Scotland Dementia Research Centre, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.
Graciela Muniz-TerreraEdinburgh Dementia Prevention Group, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.
NHS Lothian · GBAlzheimer Scotland · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We aimed to refine the hypothesis that motoric cognitive risk (MCR), a syndrome combining measured slow gait speed and self-reported cognitive complaints, is prognostic of incident dementia and other major causes of morbidity in older age. We propose mechanisms on the relationship between motor and cognitive function and describe a roadmap to validate these hypotheses. We systematically searched major electronic databases from inception to August 2021 for original longitudinal cohort studies of adults aged ≥60 years that compared an MCR group to a non-MCR group with any health outcome. Fifteen cohorts were combined by meta-analysis. Participants with MCR were at an increased risk of cognitive impairment (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR] 1.76, 95% CI 1.49-2.08; I

Indexed as

Cognition DisordersCognitive DysfunctionDementiaAgedCognitionCohort StudiesHumansLongitudinal StudiesRisk Factorsdementiafallsgaitmechanismmeta-analysismortalitymotoric cognitive riskpathophysiologypreventionprognosticreviewsubjective cognitive complaint

Identifiers

PMID35142038
PMCPMC10078717
OpenAlexW4211176520

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.