SynthesisClinical psychology & psychotherapy2022
Investigating service users' perspectives of eating disorder services: A meta-synthesis.
Synthesis in Clinical psychology & psychotherapy, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
17 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 23 citations in OpenAlex.
- Perceptions of health professionals in providing care for people with anorexia nervosa and bulimia nervosa: a systematic review and meta-synthesis of qualitative studies.Cadernos de saude publica · 2023Pooled it
- Investigating service users' perspectives of eating disorder services: A meta-synthesis.Clinical psychology & psychotherapy · 2022Pooled it
- Stepping into day treatment approach versus inpatient treatment for adults with anorexia nervosa: the DAISIES RCT.Health technology assessment (Winchester, England) · 2025Trial
- Lost in the system: lived experiences of eating disorder service models in Australia.Journal of eating disorders · 2026Article
- The ethics of mandated inpatient mental healthcare: The consumer perspective.Nursing ethics · 2026Article
- Understanding experiences of psychedelic treatments for eating disorders: a meta-synthesis of qualitative studies.BMC medicine · 2026Review
- In-home medical nutrition support for patients with severe anorexia nervosa: a mixed methods evaluation of a specialized Mobile Nutrition Team.Journal of eating disorders · 2026Article
- "Always, always have hope:" persons with lived experience, carers and health professionals' experiences before and after discharge from hospital for an eating disorder.Journal of eating disorders · 2026Article
- Article
- An overview of a 4-year period of admissions of young people with eating difficulties to a general admissions unit.BJPsych bulletin · 2025Review
- Service models in eating disorders: a scoping review.Journal of eating disorders · 2025Review
- Perspectives of general psychiatric inpatient care for persons with anorexia nervosa: an integrative literature review.BMJ open · 2025Review
- Discovering a "sense of community": patient experiences of connection in intentionally remote eating disorder care.Journal of eating disorders · 2024Article
- Embracing a different outlook: Strengths and goals of individuals currently in treatment for anorexia nervosa.Eating and weight disorders : EWD · 2024Article
- Experiences of intensive treatment for people with eating disorders: a systematic review and thematic synthesis.Journal of eating disorders · 2024Review
- Processes of change in family therapies for anorexia nervosa: a systematic review and meta-synthesis of qualitative data.Journal of eating disorders · 2024Review
- "I Need Someone to Help Me Build Up My Strength": A Meta-Synthesis of Lived Experience Perspectives on the Role and Value of a Dietitian in Eating Disorder Treatment.Behavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveDespite a number of qualitative studies published from the perspective of eating disorder (ED) service users, there has been no attempt to exclusively synthesize their views to gain a fuller understanding of their ED service experiences. It is important to understand this perspective, since previous research highlights the difficulties ED healthcare professionals report when working with this client group.
methodA systematic search of the literature was conducted to identify qualitative studies focusing on experiences of ED services from the perspective of service users. Twenty-two studies met the inclusion criteria and underwent a quality appraisal check using the Critical Appraisal Skills Programme (CASP) tool for qualitative research. These were then synthesized using a meta-synthesis approach.
resultsFour overarching themes were generated: "Treatment: Focus on physical vs. psychological symptoms"; "Service Environment: The role of control within services"; "Staff: Experiences with staff and the value of rapport"; and "Peer Influence: Camaraderie vs. comparison." Service users expressed a desire for more psychological input to tackle underlying difficulties relating to their ED. A complex relationship with feelings of control was described, with some feeling over-controlled by service providers, while others retrospectively recognized the need for control to be taken away. Staff values, knowledge and trust played a significant role in treatment and recovery. Peers with an ED were described to be a valuable source of understanding and empathy, but some found peer influence to perpetuate comparison and competitiveness. DISCUSSION: The results portray some of the conflicts and complexities that service users encounter in ED services. A running thread throughout is the perceived importance of adopting an individualized approach within these services.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.