Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35141890›Full record

ArticleThe British journal of dermatology2022

Limited impact of COVID-19-related diagnostic delay on cutaneous melanoma and squamous cell carcinoma tumour characteristics: a nationwide pathology registry analysis.

Tobias E Sangers, Marlies Wakkee, Eline C Kramer-Noels, Tamar Nijsten, Marieke W J Louwman, Elisabeth H Jaspars, Loes M Hollestein

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The British journal of dermatology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
3.0field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 29 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Tobias E SangersDepartment of Dermatology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, University Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-0948-5801
Marlies WakkeeDepartment of Dermatology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, University Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-8578-901X
Eline C Kramer-NoelsDutch Society of Dermatology and Venereology, Utrecht, the Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-9228-3332
Tamar NijstenDepartment of Dermatology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, University Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-9940-2875
Marieke W J LouwmanNetherlands Comprehensive Cancer Organization, Utrecht, the Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-9011-6741
Elisabeth H JasparsDepartment of Pathology, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Loes M HollesteinDepartment of Dermatology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, University Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-8922-6791
Erasmus MC Cancer Institute · NLAmsterdam Neuroscience · NLDutch Cancer Society · NLNetherlands Comprehensive Cancer Organisation · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe COVID-19 pandemic reduced the number of skin cancer diagnoses, potentially causing a progression to unfavourable tumour stages.

objectivesTo identify the impact of delayed diagnostics on primary invasive melanoma and cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma (cSCC) by comparing tumour (pT) stage, Breslow thickness and invasion depth from before to after the first and second lockdown periods.

methodsIn this population-based cohort study, histopathology reports registered between 1 January 2018 and 22 July 2021 were obtained from the nationwide histopathology registry in the Netherlands. The Breslow thickness of melanomas, invasion depth of cSCCs, and pT stage for both tumour types were compared across five time periods: (i) pre-COVID, (ii) first lockdown, (iii) between first and second lockdowns, (iv) second lockdown and (v) after second lockdown. Breslow thickness was compared using an independent t-test. pT-stage groups were compared using a χ

resultsIn total, 20 434 primary invasive melanomas and 68 832 cSCCs were included in this study. The mean primary melanoma Breslow thickness of the prepandemic era (period i) and the following time periods (ii-v) showed no significant difference. A small shift was found towards unfavourable pT stages during the first lockdown compared with the pre-COVID period: pT1 52·3% vs. 58·6%, pT2 18·9% vs. 17·8%, pT3 13·2% vs. 11·0%, pT4 9·1% vs. 7·3% (P = 0·001). No relevant changes were seen in subsequent periods. No significant change in pT stage distribution was observed between the pre-COVID (i) and COVID-affected periods (ii-v) for cSCCs.

conclusionsTo date, the diagnostic delay caused by COVID-19 has not resulted in relatively more unfavourable primary tumour characteristics of melanoma or cSCC. Follow-up studies in the coming years are needed to identify a potential impact on staging distribution and survival in the long term.

Indexed as

Carcinoma, Squamous CellCOVID-19MelanomaSkin NeoplasmsCohort StudiesCommunicable Disease ControlCOVID-19 TestingCutaneous Malignant MelanomaDelayed DiagnosisHumansPandemicsRegistries

Identifiers

PMID35141890
PMCPMC9111693
OpenAlexW4211056036

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.