Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35141866›Full record

ArticleApplied microbiology and biotechnology2022

A multipathogen DNA vaccine elicits protective immune responses against two class A bioterrorism agents, anthrax and botulism.

Na Young Kim, Won Rak Son, Min Hoon Lee, Hong Seok Choi, Jun Young Choi, Young Jo Song, Chi Ho Yu, Dong Hyun Song, Gyeung Haeng Hur, Seong Tae Jeong and 3 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Applied microbiology and biotechnology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 32% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Human anthrax vaccines: Current status and future prospects.Human vaccines & immunotherapeutics · 2025
    Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Anthrax: A narrative review.New microbes and new infections · 2024
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Na Young KimR&D Center, ABION Inc., Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Won Rak SonR&D Center, ABION Inc., Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Min Hoon LeeR&D Center, ABION Inc., Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Hong Seok ChoiR&D Center, ABION Inc., Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Jun Young ChoiR&D Center, ABION Inc., Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Young Jo SongThe 4th R&D Institute, Agency for Defense Development, Daejeon, Republic of Korea.
Chi Ho YuThe 4th R&D Institute, Agency for Defense Development, Daejeon, Republic of Korea.
Dong Hyun SongThe 4th R&D Institute, Agency for Defense Development, Daejeon, Republic of Korea.
Gyeung Haeng HurThe 4th R&D Institute, Agency for Defense Development, Daejeon, Republic of Korea.
Seong Tae JeongThe 4th R&D Institute, Agency for Defense Development, Daejeon, Republic of Korea.
Sung Youl HongCollege of Pharmacy and Research Institute of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Seoul National University, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Young Kee ShinDepartment of Molecular Medicine and Biopharmaceutical Sciences, Graduate School of Convergence Science and Technology, Seoul National University, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Sungho ShinBio-MAX/N-Bio, Seoul National University, Seoul, Republic of Korea. sungshin@snu.ac.kr.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1948-2284
Agency for Defense Development · KRSeoul National University · KR

Funding

agency for defense development UD180041GD
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The potential use of biological agents has become a major public health concern worldwide. According to the CDC classification, Bacillus anthracis and Clostridium botulinum, the bacterial pathogens that cause anthrax and botulism, respectively, are considered to be the most dangerous potential biological agents. Currently, there is no licensed vaccine that is well suited for mass immunization in the event of an anthrax or botulism epidemic. In the present study, we developed a dual-expression system-based multipathogen DNA vaccine that encodes the PA-D4 gene of B. anthracis and the HCt gene of C. botulinum. When the multipathogen DNA vaccine was administered to mice and guinea pigs, high level antibody responses were elicited against both PA-D4 and HCt. Analysis of the serum IgG subtype implied a combined Th1/Th2 response to both antigens, but one that was Th2 skewed. In addition, immunization with the multipathogen DNA vaccine induced effective neutralizing antibody activity against both PA-D4 and HCt. Finally, the protection efficiency of the multipathogen DNA vaccine was determined by sequential challenge with 10 LD

Indexed as

AnthraxAnthrax VaccinesBacillus anthracisBotulismVaccines, DNAAnimalsAntibodies, BacterialAntigens, BacterialBiological Warfare AgentsGuinea PigsImmunityMiceAnthrax VaccinesAntibodies, BacterialAntigens, BacterialBiological Warfare AgentsVaccines, DNAAnthraxBiothreat agentBotulismDNA vaccineMultipathogen vaccine

Identifiers

PMID35141866
PMCPMC8979915
OpenAlexW4211066629

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.