ArticleMedical & biological engineering & computing2022
Balance on different unstable supports: a complementary approach based on linear and non-linear analyses.
Article in Medical & biological engineering & computing, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Prediction of Center-of-Mass Kinematics of Sensopro Exercises with Neural Network Models.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Effects of different support surfaces on postural stability and sensorimotor cortex activation among individuals with chronic ankle instability.Frontiers in sports and active living · 2026Article
- Comprehensive linear and nonlinear analysis of the effects of spinning on dynamic balancing ability in Hungarian folk dancers.BMC sports science, medicine & rehabilitation · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Maintenance of postural control is a complex task that requires the integration of different sensory-motor processes. To improve postural control, balance training is often implemented using unstable surfaces. Little is known, however, about how different surfaces compare in terms of postural control strategy. Non-linear dynamical system analysis, like recurrent quantification analysis (RQA) applied to the center of pressure (CoP) trajectory, represents a useful tool in this respect. The aim of this study is to investigate the effects of different unstable supports on the CoP trajectory through a complementary approach based on linear and non-linear analyses. Seventeen healthy adults performed barefoot single-leg balance trials on a force plate and on three different balance training devices (soft disc, foam pad, and pillow). Sets of parameters were extracted from the CoP trajectories using classical stabilometric analysis (sway path, mean velocity, root mean square) and RQA (percent recurrence and determinism, maximum line length, entropy). Both classical and RQA analyses highlighted significant differences between stable (force plate) and unstable conditions (p < 0.001). Conversely, only classical stabilometric parameters showed significant differences among the considered balance training devices, indicating that the different characteristics of the devices do not influence the dynamic/temporal structure of the CoP trajectory. Analysis of the center of pressure trajectory during single-leg standing on three different balance training devices and on a rigid surface using both linear and non-linear techniques.
Indexed as
Identifiers
35141819What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.