ArticleJSES international2022
Wrist-mounted accelerometers provide objective evidence of disease and recovery in patients with frozen shoulder.
Article in JSES international, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- Use of commercially available wearable devices for physical rehabilitation in healthcare: a systematic review.BMJ open · 2024Pooled it
- Inertial Measurement Unit-Based Frozen Shoulder Identification from Daily Shoulder Tasks Using Machine Learning Approaches.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundCommercially available wrist-mounted exercise monitors may offer objective data on disease and recovery. This study is the first to evaluate the potential of such devices in the assessment of frozen shoulder and the effects of treatment.
methodsTwenty-one patients with isolated, unilateral frozen shoulder wore a wrist-mounted accelerometer (Fitbit Fire II, Fitbit Inc. 2007, California, USA) on each wrist for two separate seven-day periods, one week before and six months after treatment. The monitors produced an activity count for each 24-hour period, accounting for all movements of the upper limb. Three values were calculated for each time period: (1) the mean activity count for each limb, (2) the total activity count for both limbs, and (3) an activity count ratio calculated by dividing the activity of the frozen limb by the unaffected limb. Constant score, American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons, visual analog scale-pain, and range of movement were recorded before and after treatment.
resultsMean activity counts were significantly lower in the frozen shoulder limb than those in the unaffected limb over the initial seven-day period (6066 vs. 7516; DISCUSSION: Wrist-mounted accelerometers are sufficiently sensitive to detect a difference in limb activity in patients affected by frozen shoulder. The movement deficit between the affected and unaffected limbs improved by 14% after treatment. These data could be used in conjunction with subjective scores to offer a clearer insight into patient disease burden and recovery.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.