Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35141669›Full record

ArticleJSES international2022

Trends in outpatient versus inpatient total shoulder arthroplasty over time.

Nabil Mehta, Daniel D Bohl, Matthew R Cohn, Johnathon R McCormick, Gregory P Nicholson, Grant E Garrigues, Nikhil N Verma

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JSES international, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
4.2field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 30 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Outpatient Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty.Current reviews in musculoskeletal medicine · 2026
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Predictors of inpatient mortality following reverse shoulder arthroplasty.Archives of orthopaedic and trauma surgery · 2024
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Nabil MehtaDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL, USA.
Daniel D BohlDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Baylor University Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA.
Matthew R CohnDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL, USA.
Johnathon R McCormickDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL, USA.
Gregory P NicholsonDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL, USA.
Grant E GarriguesDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL, USA.
Nikhil N VermaDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL, USA.
Rush University Medical Center · USBaylor University Medical Center · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe purpose of this study was to investigate the safety of outpatient and inpatient total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA) and to investigate changes over time.

methodsPatients undergoing primary TSA during 2006-2019 as part of the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program were identified. Patients were divided into an early cohort (2006-2016, 12,401 patients) and a late cohort (2017-2019, 12,845 patients). Outpatient procedures were defined as those discharged on the day of surgery. Patient comorbidities and rate of adverse events within 30 days postoperatively were compared with adjustment for baseline characteristics using standard multivariate regression.

resultsThere was a significant reduction in complications over time when considering all cases (5.69% in the early cohort vs. 3.67% in the late cohort, adjusted relative risk [RR] = 0.65, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.58-0.73,

conclusionThe overall complication rate of TSA has decreased over time as outpatient TSA has become increasingly common. When contemporary data are examined, the complication rate of outpatient procedures has remained constant over time while that of inpatient procedures decreased, despite the changing demographics of patients undergoing TSA. This indicates that outpatient TSA remains a safe procedure as patient selection criteria have evolved, while the safety of inpatient TSA continues to improve.

Indexed as

Clinical outcomesComplications over timeInpatient surgeryOutpatient surgeryReverse total shoulder arthroplastyTotal shoulder arthroplasty

Identifiers

PMID35141669
PMCPMC8811390
OpenAlexW3211911466

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.