Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35141622›Full record

ArticleNorth American Spine Society journal2021

Initial multi-centre clinical experience with prone transpsoas lateral interbody fusion: Feasibility, perioperative outcomes, and lessons learned.

Tyler G Smith, Samuel A Joseph, Benjamin Ditty, Rodrigo Amaral, Antoine Tohmeh, William R Taylor, Luiz Pimenta

Abstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in North American Spine Society journal, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Prone position lateral interbody fusion-a narrative review.Journal of spine surgery (Hong Kong) · 2023
    Review
  13. A retrospective review of single-position prone lateral lumbar interbody fusion cases: early learning curve and perioperative outcomes.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2023
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Tyler G SmithSierra Spine Institute, Roseville, CA, United States.
Samuel A JosephJoseph Spine Institute, Tampa, FL, United States.
Benjamin DittyThe Spine Center at Joint Implant Surgeons of Florida, Naples, FL, United States.
Rodrigo AmaralInstituto de Patologia da Coluna, São Paulo, Brazil.
Antoine TohmehMultiCare Neurosurgery and Spine, Spokane, WA, United States.
William R TaylorUniversity of California San Diego, San Diego, CA, United States.
Luiz PimentaInstituto de Patologia da Coluna, São Paulo, Brazil.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundLateral interbody fusion (LIF) is traditionally performed with the patient in lateral decubitus, requiring repositioning to prone for adjunctive posterior procedures, or modifying traditional posterior techniques to be done while positioned lateral. The benefits of lateral anterior column access may be achievable with the patient prone, allowing for concomitant posterior techniques in a more familiar single-position setting.

methodsProne transpsoas (PTP) access was outlined and vetted by a group of LIF-experienced spine surgeons. Early clinical experience included prospectively capturing procedural details and perioperative outcomes across a multi-centre cohort of clinicians to assess feasibility and to identify efficiencies and/or challenges.

resultsPerioperative data was prospectively collected from 120 consecutive cases (176 levels) from 22 surgeons. Lateral exposure was achieved in an average 18 min/level, guided by triggered EMG; and retraction time averaged 25 min/level, with continued plexus monitoring via saphenous SSEP. Fixation was via percutaneous pedicle screws (65%), open pedicle screws (24%), other (11%). No re-positioning was required. Concomitant procedures facilitated by prone position included direct decompression (37%), treatment at L5-S1 (18%), posterior instrumentation revision (7%), and osteotomy/bony releases (9%). PTP procedure time, blood loss, and length of stay were consistent with established LIF experience. Challenges included patient movement with lateral instrument forces, retractor sag, stability of access relative to the patient, and surgeon ergonomics of the working channel. These challenges were overcome later in the experience through development of a specialized positioner and retractor system specific to this approach and a prescribed workflow developed by consensus of the surgeons.

conclusionInitial multi-centre clinical experience suggests that PTP is not only feasible but creates efficiencies by allowing for single-position surgery maximizing both anterior and posterior column access and corrective techniques, with perioperative outcomes consistent with lateral decubitus experience. Learnings included the need for development of procedure-specific technologies and technique refinement.

Indexed as

ApproachDecubitusLIFLLIFMinimally invasiveMISPTPSurgical positionTechniqueXLIF

Identifiers

PMID35141622
PMCPMC8819959

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.