Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35141620›Full record

ArticleNorth American Spine Society journal2021

Postoperative bracing practices after elective lumbar spine surgery: A questionnaire study of U.S. spine surgeons.

Neil Pathak, Michelle C Scott, Anoop R Galivanche, Patrick J Burroughs, Harold G Moore, Ari S Hilibrand, Rohil Malpani, Marissa Justen, Arya G Varthi, Jonathan N Grauer

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in North American Spine Society journal, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Does the use of postoperative brace help preventing mechanical complications following adult deformity surgery?European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2023
    Article
  9. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Neil PathakDepartment of Orthopaedics and Rehabilitation, Yale School of Medicine, PO Box 208071, New Haven, CT 06520-8071, United States.
Michelle C ScottDepartment of Orthopaedics and Rehabilitation, Yale School of Medicine, PO Box 208071, New Haven, CT 06520-8071, United States.
Anoop R GalivancheDepartment of Orthopaedics and Rehabilitation, Yale School of Medicine, PO Box 208071, New Haven, CT 06520-8071, United States.
Patrick J BurroughsDepartment of Orthopaedics and Rehabilitation, Yale School of Medicine, PO Box 208071, New Haven, CT 06520-8071, United States.
Harold G MooreDepartment of Orthopaedics and Rehabilitation, Yale School of Medicine, PO Box 208071, New Haven, CT 06520-8071, United States.
Ari S HilibrandDepartment of Orthopaedics and Rehabilitation, Yale School of Medicine, PO Box 208071, New Haven, CT 06520-8071, United States.
Rohil MalpaniDepartment of Orthopaedics and Rehabilitation, Yale School of Medicine, PO Box 208071, New Haven, CT 06520-8071, United States.
Marissa JustenDepartment of Orthopaedics and Rehabilitation, Yale School of Medicine, PO Box 208071, New Haven, CT 06520-8071, United States.
Arya G VarthiDepartment of Orthopaedics and Rehabilitation, Yale School of Medicine, PO Box 208071, New Haven, CT 06520-8071, United States.
Jonathan N GrauerDepartment of Orthopaedics and Rehabilitation, Yale School of Medicine, PO Box 208071, New Haven, CT 06520-8071, United States.
Yale University · US

Funding

Short-Term Reserch Training: Students in Health SchoolsT35HL007649 · NHLBI · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI Sarwat I Chaudhry, Erica L Herzog · 1987 to 2026
$5.7M
NHLBI NIH HHS T35 HL007649
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThere is limited data available on the use of orthoses across varying elective spine surgeries. When previously studied in 2009, inconsistent lumbar postoperative bracing practices were reported. The present study aimed to provide a ten-year update regarding postoperative bracing practices after elective lumbar surgery among United States (U.S.) spine surgeons.

methodsA questionnaire was distributed to attendees of the Lumbar Spine Research Society Annual Meeting (April 2019). The questionnaire collected demographic information, and asked surgeons to identify if they used orthoses postoperatively after ten elective lumbar surgeries. Information regarding type of brace, duration of use, and reason for bracing was also collected. Chi-square tests and one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) were used for comparisons.

resultsSeventy-three of 88 U.S. attending surgeons completed the questionnaire (response rate: 83%). The majority of respondents were orthopaedic surgery-trained (78%), fellowship-trained (84%), and academic surgeons (73%). The majority of respondents (60%) did not use orthoses after any lumbar surgery. Among the surgeons who braced, the overall bracing frequency was 26%. This rate was significantly lower than that reported in the literature ten years earlier (

conclusionMost surgeon respondents did not prescribe orthoses after varying elective lumbar surgeries, and the frequency overall was lower than a similar study conducted in 2009. There continues to be inconsistencies in postoperative bracing practices. In an era striving for evidence-based practices, this is an area needing more attention.

Indexed as

Bracing frequenciesLumbar corsetLumbar sacral orthosisLumbar spine surgeryOrthosesSpine surgeons

Identifiers

PMID35141620
PMCPMC8820027
OpenAlexW3133848516

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.