ArticleNorth American Spine Society journal2020
The role of the plastic surgeon in wound repair after spinal surgery.
Article in North American Spine Society journal, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- Risk factors for surgical site infection following posterior lumbar interbody fusion in patients with degenerative lumbar spine disease: a retrospective study.BMC surgery · 2026Article
- Ultrasound-Guided Photoacoustic Monitoring of Vascular Ischemia in Implant-Induced Skin Necrosis.Ultrasound in medicine & biology · 2025Article
- Prevention and Management of Posterior Wound Complications Following Oncologic Spine Surgery: Narrative Review of Available Evidence and Proposed Clinical Decision-Making Algorithm.Global spine journal · 2025Article
- Article
- Scoliosis Correction in an Adolescent With Hajdu-Cheney Syndrome: A Case Report.HSS journal : the musculoskeletal journal of Hospital for Special Surgery · 2022Article
- Brothers-in-arms: Liaison between spine surgeons and plastic surgeons in wound repair after complex spine surgery.North American Spine Society journal · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundWound complications, including dehiscence and surgical site infections, following spinal surgery have the potential to be devastating both to the patient and to the hospital system. Complications can occur in a wide range of patients including diabetics, those of low or high BMI and those of old age. Obese patients and those with increased subcutaneous fat are at particularly high risk for wound complications, which may be mitigated through use of local flap reconstruction by a Plastic Surgeon. CASE DESCRIPTION: A 28 year-old female with morbid obesity presents with multiple lumbar transverse process fractures and complex sacral and pelvic fractures requiring closed reduction and percutaneous fixation of the pelvic ring followed by posterior spinal fusion. The patient was closed tension-free by the neurosurgery team and ultimately dehisced requiring consultation and management by Plastic Surgery. OUTCOME: The patient underwent debridement and reconstruction with a gluteus maximus myocutaneous flap advancement without complication.
conclusionsWound management after spinal surgery is a complex problem, which may be prophylaxed through early identification of high-risk patients and preoperative consultation of Plastic Surgery. Patients with increased thickness of subcutaneous fat are at particularly high risk for postoperative complications, including infection and dehiscence, secondary to increased tissue manipulation and necrosis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.