Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35141532›Full record

ArticleArthroscopy, sports medicine, and rehabilitation2022

Anterolateral Ligament Reconstruction Does Not Delay Functional Recovery, Rehabilitation, and Return to Sport After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Matched-Pair Analysis From the SANTI (Scientific ACL Network International) Study Group.

Marine Coquard, Alessandro Carrozzo, Adnan Saithna, Gregory Vigne, Meven Le Guen, Yann Fournier, Jean-Philippe Hager, Thais Dutra Vieira, Bertrand Sonnery-Cottet

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Arthroscopy, sports medicine, and rehabilitation, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
5.2field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. [Modified Lemaire procedure in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with highly positive pivot shift test].Zhongguo xiu fu chong jian wai ke za zhi = Zhongguo xiufu chongjian waike zazhi = Chinese journal of reparative and reconstructive surgery · 2025
    Article
  7. Observational
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Marine CoquardCentre Orthopédique Santy, FIFA Medical Center of Excellence, Groupe Ramsay-Generale de Santé, Lyon, France.
Alessandro CarrozzoCentre Orthopédique Santy, FIFA Medical Center of Excellence, Groupe Ramsay-Generale de Santé, Lyon, France.
Adnan SaithnaArizona Brain, Spine & Sports Injuries Center, Scottsdale, Arizona, U.S.A.
Gregory VigneReathletic France, Lyon, France.
Meven Le GuenReathletic France, Lyon, France.
Yann FournierCentre Orthopédique Santy, FIFA Medical Center of Excellence, Groupe Ramsay-Generale de Santé, Lyon, France.
Jean-Philippe HagerCentre Orthopédique Santy, FIFA Medical Center of Excellence, Groupe Ramsay-Generale de Santé, Lyon, France.
Thais Dutra VieiraCentre Orthopédique Santy, FIFA Medical Center of Excellence, Groupe Ramsay-Generale de Santé, Lyon, France.
Bertrand Sonnery-CottetCentre Orthopédique Santy, FIFA Medical Center of Excellence, Groupe Ramsay-Generale de Santé, Lyon, France.
Centre Orthopédique Santy · FRResearch, Evaluation and Social Solutions (United States) · USBarrow Brain and Spine · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo determine whether the addition of an anterolateral ligament reconstruction (ALLR) resulted in delayed functional recovery (based on the Knee Santy Athletic Return to Sport [K-STARTS] score) at 6 months after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR).

methodsA retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data from consecutive patients who underwent an ACLR between September 2017 and December 2020 was conducted. Patients who received an isolated hamstring autograft (isolated ACLR group) were propensity matched in a 1:1 ratio to patients who received a hamstring autograft ACLR combined with an ALLR (ACLR-ALLR group). Outcome measures included the Tegner Activity Scale and the K-STARTS test-a validated composite return-to-sports test (including the Anterior Cruciate Ligament-Return to Sport After Injury scale, Qualitative Assessment of Single-Leg Landing tool, limb symmetry index, and ability to change direction using the Modified Illinois Change of Direction Test).

resultsThe study included 111 matched pairs. At 6 months postoperatively, there were no significant differences between groups in the overall K-STARTS score (65.4 for isolated ACLR vs 61.2 for ACLR-ALLR,

conclusionsThe addition of ALLR at the time of ACLR does not delay functional recovery. Specifically, at 6 months postoperatively, there was no disadvantage in patients undergoing ALLR-ACLR, when compared with those undergoing isolated ACLR, with respect to neuromuscular control, limb symmetry indices (hop tests), agility, or psychological readiness to return to sport. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III, retrospective comparative study.

Identifiers

PMID35141532
PMCPMC8811495
OpenAlexW4210644030

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.