ArticleCritical care explorations2022
Concomitant Sepsis Diagnoses in Acute Myocardial Infarction-Cardiogenic Shock: 15-Year National Temporal Trends, Management, and Outcomes.
Article in Critical care explorations, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
22 citing papers in PubMed, 32 citations in OpenAlex.
- Coronary microvascular function in patients with sepsis and myocardial injury: an invasive coronary physiology study.Critical care (London, England) · 2026Observational
- Tetrandrine has protective role in myocardial ischemia/reperfusion injury via the TRPV2/CaHerz · 2026Article
- Nationwide trends and disparities in deaths following cardiogenic shock and sepsis in the United States (1999-2023): insights from the CDC WONDER database.BMC cardiovascular disorders · 2025Article
- Fever in Myocardial Infarction-Related Cardiogenic Shock.JACC. Advances · 2025Article
- Interleukin-6 in Cardiogenic Shock.Current cardiology reports · 2025Review
- Anti-inflammatory interventions in coronary artery disease: antipodal responses requiring targeted therapeutic strategies.Basic research in cardiology · 2025Review
- Transient Coronary Microvascular Dysfunction in Septic Shock.JACC. Case reports · 2025Article
- Complex Sepsis Presentations, SEP-1 Compliance, and Outcomes.JAMA network open · 2025Article
- Development of an Extended Cardiovascular SOFA Score Component Reflecting Cardiac Dysfunction with Improved Survival Prediction in Sepsis: An Exploratory Analysis in the Sepsis and Elevated Troponin (SET) Study.Journal of intensive care medicine · 2025Article
- Validation of SCAI Shock Staging in Critically Ill Medical Intensive Care Unit Patients With Sepsis and Septic Shock.Journal of community hospital internal medicine perspectives · 2025Article
- Mixed Cardiogenic-Vasodilatory Shock: Current Insights and Future Directions.JACC. Advances · 2025Review
- 'July effect' in management and outcomes of patients admitted with pulmonary embolism in the United States, 2016 to 2021.Proceedings (Baylor University. Medical Center) · 2025Article
- Machine learning for predicting acute myocardial infarction in patients with sepsis.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Future Training Pathways in Percutaneous Coronary Interventions: Interventional Critical Care, Complex Coronary Interventions, and Interventional Heart Failure.JACC. Advances · 2024Review
- The Role of Inflammation in the Pathogenesis of Cardiogenic Shock Secondary to Acute Myocardial Infarction: A Narrative Review.Biomedicines · 2024Review
- The Role of Prognostic Scores in Assessing the Prognosis of Patients Admitted in the Cardiac Intensive Care Unit: Emphasis on Heart Failure Patients.Journal of clinical medicine · 2024Article
- Need for a Cardiogenic Shock Team Collaborative-Promoting a Team-Based Model of Care to Improve Outcomes and Identify Best Practices.Journal of the American Heart Association · 2024Review
- Training Paradigms in Critical Care Cardiology: A Scoping Review of Current Literature.JACC. Advances · 2024Article
- [Analysis of the unicentric registry of the Infarction Code program: retrospective cohort].Revista medica del Instituto Mexicano del Seguro Social · 2024Observational
- Extending the 'host response' paradigm from sepsis to cardiogenic shock: evidence, limitations and opportunities.Critical care (London, England) · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
objectivesMixed cardiogenic-septic shock is common and associated with high mortality. There are limited contemporary data on concomitant sepsis in acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock (AMI-CS).
designObservational study.
settingTwenty percent stratified sample of all community hospitals (2000-2014) in the United States.
participantsAdults (> 18 yr) with AMI-CS with and without concomitant sepsis.
interventionsNone. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN
resultsOutcomes of interest included inhospital mortality, development of noncardiac organ failure, complications, utilization of guideline-directed procedures, length of stay, and hospitalization costs. Over 15 years, 444,253 AMI-CS admissions were identified, of which 27,057 (6%) included sepsis. The sepsis cohort had more comorbidities and had higher rates of noncardiac multiple organ failure (92% vs 69%) (all
conclusionsIn AMI-CS, concomitant sepsis is associated with higher mortality and morbidity highlighting the need for early recognition and integrated management of mixed shock.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.