Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35141518›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in artificial intelligence2021

Augmenting Semantic Lexicons Using Word Embeddings and Transfer Learning.

Thayer Alshaabi, Colin M Van Oort, Mikaela Irene Fudolig, Michael V Arnold, Christopher M Danforth, Peter Sheridan Dodds

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in artificial intelligence, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Thayer AlshaabiAdvanced Bioimaging Center, University of California, Berkeley, Berkeley, CA, United States.
Colin M Van OortVermont Complex Systems Center, University of Vermont, Burlington, VT, United States.
Mikaela Irene FudoligVermont Complex Systems Center, University of Vermont, Burlington, VT, United States.
Michael V ArnoldVermont Complex Systems Center, University of Vermont, Burlington, VT, United States.
Christopher M DanforthVermont Complex Systems Center, University of Vermont, Burlington, VT, United States.
Peter Sheridan DoddsVermont Complex Systems Center, University of Vermont, Burlington, VT, United States.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Sentiment-aware intelligent systems are essential to a wide array of applications. These systems are driven by language models which broadly fall into two paradigms: Lexicon-based and contextual. Although recent contextual models are increasingly dominant, we still see demand for lexicon-based models because of their interpretability and ease of use. For example, lexicon-based models allow researchers to readily determine which words and phrases contribute most to a change in measured sentiment. A challenge for any lexicon-based approach is that the lexicon needs to be routinely expanded with new words and expressions. Here, we propose two models for automatic lexicon expansion. Our first model establishes a baseline employing a simple and shallow neural network initialized with pre-trained word embeddings using a non-contextual approach. Our second model improves upon our baseline, featuring a deep Transformer-based network that brings to bear word definitions to estimate their lexical polarity. Our evaluation shows that both models are able to score new words with a similar accuracy to reviewers from Amazon Mechanical Turk, but at a fraction of the cost.

Indexed as

BERTFastTextlabMTsemantic lexiconssentiment analysistransformersword embedding

Identifiers

PMID35141518
PMCPMC8819185

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.