Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35141459›Full record

ReviewResearch and practice in thrombosis and haemostasis2022

The lived experience of women with a bleeding disorder: A systematic review.

Anna Sanigorska, Steve Chaplin, Mike Holland, Kate Khair, Debra Pollard

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Research and practice in thrombosis and haemostasis, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Hemophilia's Overlooked Female Face.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026
    Review
  4. Review
  5. Von Willebrand disease: more than just a bleeding disorder.Research and practice in thrombosis and haemostasis · 2026
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Multidisciplinary perinatal care for women with bleeding disorders.Research and practice in thrombosis and haemostasis · 2025
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Observational
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. What have we learned about the patient's experience of von Willebrand disease? A focus on women.Hematology. American Society of Hematology. Education Program · 2022
    Review
  18. The lived experience of women with a bleeding disorder: A systematic review.Research and practice in thrombosis and haemostasis · 2022
    Review
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Anna SanigorskaOxford Haemophilia and Thrombosis Centre Churchill Hospital Oxford UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7993-9501
Steve ChaplinHaemnet London UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7508-5609
Mike HollandHaemnet London UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9173-4100
Debra PollardHaemnet London UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7797-3500

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundResearch studies have described the morbidity associated with inherited bleeding disorders such as hemophilia and von Willebrand disease in women, but their effect on daily living has long been underrecognized. This systematic review sought to document the lived experience of women with a bleeding disorder by assessing research findings on quality of health care, socioeconomic factors, and mental health.

methodsA systematic search was carried out in Web of Science, the Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature, and PubMed on July 31, 2020. References were hand searched. Abstracts of the 2019 and 2020 congresses on bleeding disorders were hand searched. Key journals were screened for relevant studies published after the search date until the analysis was completed on December 7, 2020.

resultsOf 635 potentially eligible publications, 27 published since 1998 were selected for review. Most studies were of moderate to high quality but meta-analysis of quantitative studies was not possible due to difference in outcomes and assessment.Women with a bleeding disorder experience obstacles to accessing care, difficulties living with their disorder, interference with schooling and work, and poor mental health. Diagnostic delay and lack of recognition of symptoms mean treatment and support may not be available. Where comparisons with controls were made, women's negative experiences were greater than those of men.

conclusionsWomen with bleeding disorders experience major negative impacts of their disorders on daily life and mental well-being. Many of the challenges identified in earlier research are evident in more recent studies.

Indexed as

access and evaluationhealth care qualityhemophiliamental healthsocioeconomic factorssystematic reviewwomen

Identifiers

PMID35141459
PMCPMC8813663

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.