ArticleHeliyon2022
Characterization of spiny lobsters from Bangladesh waters using morphology, COI and 16S rRNA sequences.
Article in Heliyon, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.
- Insights into the Deep Phylogeny and Novel Gene Rearrangement of Mytiloidea from Complete Mitochondrial Genome.Biochemical genetics · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study aims to taxonomically identify and characterise the phylogenetic relationships of spiny lobsters based on mitochondrial cytochrome c oxidase I (COI) and 16S rRNA genes from Bangladesh waters. A total of 19 barcode sequences (10 partial COI sequences and 9 partial 16S rRNA) were successfully generated from 12 collected spiny lobster samples representing four species belonging to the family Palinuridae. The average genetic distances within and between species were 0.834 ± 0.427 and 17.810 ± 0.830, respectively, in COI and 0.107 ± 0.255 and 8.401 ± 2.547, respectively, in 16S rRNA genes. The successful amplification rate of 16S rRNA was higher than that of the COI marker. In the maximum likelihood (ML) tree, the sequences of the same species were clustered together under a single clade for both COI and 16S rRNA, which supports the efficacy of both marker genes in differentiating lobster species.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.