ArticleHeliyon2022
Development and validation using NHANES data of a predictive model for depression risk in myocardial infarction survivors.
Article in Heliyon, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 16 citations in OpenAlex.
- Risk prediction models for depression in patients with coronary heart disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2024Pooled it
- Evaluating AUC estimators across complex sampling designs: insights from COVID-19 patient data.BMC medical research methodology · 2025Article
- Opposite outcomes of triglyceride-glucose index and associated cardiovascular mortality risk in type 2 diabetes mellitus participants by different obesity criteria.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- A predictive model for depression risk in individuals with hypertension: evidence from NHANES 2007-2020.BMC public health · 2025Article
- Construction and Validation of a Major Depression Risk Predictive Model for Patients with Coronary Heart Disease: Insights from NHANES 2005-2018.Reviews in cardiovascular medicine · 2025Article
- Age, Creatinine, and Ejection Fraction (ACEF) Score is Associated with the Presence of Depression and Anxiety Symptoms in PCI Patients.Neuropsychiatric disease and treatment · 2025Article
- Article
- Building a predictive model for depression risk in fracture patients: insights from cross-sectional NHANES 2005-2020 data and an external hospital-based dataset.BMC public health · 2024Article
- Article
- Nomogram for Predicting the Risk of Short Sleep Duration in Myocardial Infarction Survivors.Reviews in cardiovascular medicine · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundDepression after myocardial infarction (MI) is associated with poor prognosis. This study aimed to develop and validate a nomogram to predict the risk of depression in patients with MI.
methodsThis retrospective study included 1615 survivors of MI aged >20 years who were selected from the 2005-2018 National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey database. The 899 subjects from the 2005-2012 survey comprised the development group, and the remaining 716 subjects comprised the validation group. Univariate and multivariate analyses identified variables significantly associated with depression. The least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) binomial regression model was used to select the best predictive variables.
resultsA full predictive model and a simplified model were developed using multivariate analysis and LASSO binomial regression results, respectively, and validated using data from the validation group. The receiver operator characteristic curve and Hosmer-Lemeshow goodness of fit test were used to assess the nomogram's performance. The full nomogram model included 8 items: age, BMI, smoking, drinking, diabetes, exercise, insomnia, and PIR. The area under the curve for the development group was 0.799 and for the validation group was 0.731, indicating that our model has good stability and predictive accuracy. The goodness of fit test showed a good model calibration for both groups. The simplified model includes age, smoking, PIR, and insomnia. The AUC of the simplified model was 0.772 and 0.711 in the development and validation groups, respectively, indicating that the simplified model still possessed good predictive accuracy.
conclusionOur nomogram helped assess the individual probability of depression after MI and can be used as a complement to existing depression screening scales to help physicians make better treatment decisions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.