ArticleFrontiers in molecular biosciences2021
Predicting Drosha and Dicer Cleavage Sites with DeepMirCut.
Article in Frontiers in molecular biosciences, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- Description Generation Using Variational Auto-Encoders for Precursor microRNA.Entropy (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Article
- Advances and Obstacles in Using CRISPR/Cas9 Technology for Non-Coding RNA Gene Knockout in Human Mesenchymal Stromal Cells.Non-coding RNA · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
MicroRNAs are a class of small RNAs involved in post-transcriptional gene silencing with roles in disease and development. Many computational tools have been developed to identify novel microRNAs. However, there have been no attempts to predict cleavage sites for Drosha from primary sequence, or to identify cleavage sites using deep neural networks. Here, we present DeepMirCut, a recurrent neural network-based software that predicts both Dicer and Drosha cleavage sites. We built a microRNA primary sequence database including flanking genomic sequences for 34,713 microRNA annotations. We compare models trained on sequence data, sequence and secondary structure data, as well as input data with annotated structures. Our best model is able to predict cuts within closer average proximity than results reported for other methods. We show that a guanine nucleotide before and a uracil nucleotide after Dicer cleavage sites on the 3' arm of the microRNA precursor had a positive effect on predictions while the opposite order (U before, G after) had a negative effect. Our analysis was also able to predict several positions where bulges had either positive or negative effects on the score. We expect that our approach and the data we have curated will enable several future studies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.