Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35141019›Full record

ArticleAmerican journal of cancer research2022

A radiologic diagnostic scoring model based on CT features for differentiating gastric schwannoma from gastric gastrointestinal stromal tumors.

Jian-Xia Xu, Jie-Ni Yu, Xiao-Jie Wang, Yan-Xi Xiong, Yuan-Fei Lu, Jia-Ping Zhou, Qiao-Mei Zhou, Xiao-Yan Yang, Dan Shi, Xiao-Shan Huang and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in American journal of cancer research, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Observational
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. [Laparoscopic management of gastric schwannoma].Revista medica del Instituto Mexicano del Seguro Social · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Jian-Xia XuDepartment of Radiology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang Chinese Medical University 318 Chao-Wang Road, Hangzhou 310005, Zhejiang Province, China.
Jie-Ni YuDepartment of Radiology, Second Affiliated Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University 88 Jie-Fang Road, Hangzhou 310009, Zhejiang Province, China.
Xiao-Jie WangDepartment of Radiology, Second Affiliated Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University 88 Jie-Fang Road, Hangzhou 310009, Zhejiang Province, China.
Yan-Xi XiongDepartment of Radiology, Renmin Hospital, Hubei University of Medicine Shiyan 442000, Hubei Province, China.
Yuan-Fei LuDepartment of Radiology, Second Affiliated Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University 88 Jie-Fang Road, Hangzhou 310009, Zhejiang Province, China.
Jia-Ping ZhouDepartment of Radiology, Second Affiliated Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University 88 Jie-Fang Road, Hangzhou 310009, Zhejiang Province, China.
Qiao-Mei ZhouDepartment of Radiology, Second Affiliated Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University 88 Jie-Fang Road, Hangzhou 310009, Zhejiang Province, China.
Xiao-Yan YangDepartment of Radiology, Second Affiliated Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University 88 Jie-Fang Road, Hangzhou 310009, Zhejiang Province, China.
Dan ShiDepartment of Radiology, Second Affiliated Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University 88 Jie-Fang Road, Hangzhou 310009, Zhejiang Province, China.
Xiao-Shan HuangDepartment of Radiology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang Chinese Medical University 318 Chao-Wang Road, Hangzhou 310005, Zhejiang Province, China.
Shu-Feng FanDepartment of Radiology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang Chinese Medical University 318 Chao-Wang Road, Hangzhou 310005, Zhejiang Province, China.
Ri-Sheng YuDepartment of Radiology, Second Affiliated Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University 88 Jie-Fang Road, Hangzhou 310009, Zhejiang Province, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We aimed to further explore the CT features of gastric schwannoma (GS), propose and validate a convenient diagnostic scoring system to distinguish GS from gastric gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) preoperatively. 170 patients with submucosal tumors pathologically confirmed (GS n=35; gastric GISTs n=135) from Hospital 1 were analyzed retrospectively as the training cohort, and 72 patients (GS=11; gastric GISTs=61) from Hospital 2 were enrolled as the validation cohort. We searched for significant CT imaging characteristics and constructed the scoring system via binary logistic regression and converted regression coefficients to weighted scores. The ROC curves, AUCs and calibration tests were carried out to evaluate the scoring models in both the training cohort and the validation cohort. For convenient assessment, the system was further divided into four score ranges and their diagnostic probability of GS was calculated respectively. Four CT imaging characteristics were ultimately enrolled in this scoring system, including transverse position (2 points), location (5 points), perilesional lymph nodes (6 points) and pattern of enhancement (2 points). The AUC of the scoring model in the training cohort were 0.873 (95% CI, 0.816-0.929) and the cutoff point was 6 points. In the validation cohort, the AUC was 0.898 (95% CI, 0.804-0.957) and the cutoff value was 5 points. Four score ranges were as follows: 0-3 points for very low probability of GS, 4-7 points for low probability; 8-9 points for middle probability; 10-15 points for very high probability. A convenient scoring model to preoperatively discriminate GS from gastric GISTs was finally proposed.

Indexed as

contrast-enhanced CTgastric neoplasmsGastric schwannomagastrointestinal stromal tumorsscoring model

Identifiers

PMID35141019
PMCPMC8822295

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.