ArticleAmerican journal of cancer research2022
A radiologic diagnostic scoring model based on CT features for differentiating gastric schwannoma from gastric gastrointestinal stromal tumors.
Article in American journal of cancer research, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed.
- A clinical and head CT-based scoring system for predicting high cerebral microbleeds burden in hypertensive patients.BMC medical imaging · 2026Observational
- A pilot study on the application and efficacy of mucosal traction-assisted clip closure in endoscopic full-thickness resection for gastric submucosal tumors.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- A CT-based decision tree model for differentiating sub-3 cm gastric ectopic pancreas from gastrointestinal stromal tumors.BMC gastroenterology · 2025Article
- [Laparoscopic management of gastric schwannoma].Revista medica del Instituto Mexicano del Seguro Social · 2025Article
- A scoring model based on MRI features for predicting early recurrence after surgical resection of hepatocellular carcinoma.Frontiers in surgery · 2025Article
- Article
- Radiomics analysis of contrast-enhanced computerized tomography for differentiation of gastric schwannomas from gastric gastrointestinal stromal tumors.Journal of cancer research and clinical oncology · 2024Article
- Identifying subtle differences : a radiomics model assessment for gastric schwannomas and gastrointestinal stromal tumors across risk grades.Frontiers in oncology · 2024Article
- Preoperative differentiation of gastric schwannomas and gastrointestinal stromal tumors based on computed tomography: a retrospective multicenter observational study.Frontiers in oncology · 2024Article
- Clinicopathological characteristics of gastrointestinal schwannomas: A retrospective analysis of 78 cases.Frontiers in oncology · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
We aimed to further explore the CT features of gastric schwannoma (GS), propose and validate a convenient diagnostic scoring system to distinguish GS from gastric gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) preoperatively. 170 patients with submucosal tumors pathologically confirmed (GS n=35; gastric GISTs n=135) from Hospital 1 were analyzed retrospectively as the training cohort, and 72 patients (GS=11; gastric GISTs=61) from Hospital 2 were enrolled as the validation cohort. We searched for significant CT imaging characteristics and constructed the scoring system via binary logistic regression and converted regression coefficients to weighted scores. The ROC curves, AUCs and calibration tests were carried out to evaluate the scoring models in both the training cohort and the validation cohort. For convenient assessment, the system was further divided into four score ranges and their diagnostic probability of GS was calculated respectively. Four CT imaging characteristics were ultimately enrolled in this scoring system, including transverse position (2 points), location (5 points), perilesional lymph nodes (6 points) and pattern of enhancement (2 points). The AUC of the scoring model in the training cohort were 0.873 (95% CI, 0.816-0.929) and the cutoff point was 6 points. In the validation cohort, the AUC was 0.898 (95% CI, 0.804-0.957) and the cutoff value was 5 points. Four score ranges were as follows: 0-3 points for very low probability of GS, 4-7 points for low probability; 8-9 points for middle probability; 10-15 points for very high probability. A convenient scoring model to preoperatively discriminate GS from gastric GISTs was finally proposed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
35141019PMC8822295What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.