Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35141010›Full record

ArticleAmerican journal of cancer research2022

Association of machine learning ultrasound radiomics and disease outcome in triple negative breast cancer.

Haoyu Wang, Xiaokang Li, Ying Yuan, Yiwei Tong, Siyi Zhu, Renhong Huang, Kunwei Shen, Yi Guo, Yuanyuan Wang, Xiaosong Chen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in American journal of cancer research, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. A Review of the Role of Ultrasound Radiomics and Its Application and Limitations in the Investigation of Thyroid Disease.Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research · 2022
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Haoyu WangDepartment of General Surgery, Comprehensive Breast Health Center, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine Shanghai 200025, China.
Xiaokang LiDepartment of Electronic Engineering, Fudan University Shanghai 200433, China.
Ying YuanDepartment of Radiology, Shanghai Ninth People's Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine Shanghai 200010, China.
Yiwei TongDepartment of General Surgery, Comprehensive Breast Health Center, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine Shanghai 200025, China.
Siyi ZhuDepartment of General Surgery, Comprehensive Breast Health Center, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine Shanghai 200025, China.
Renhong HuangDepartment of General Surgery, Comprehensive Breast Health Center, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine Shanghai 200025, China.
Kunwei ShenDepartment of General Surgery, Comprehensive Breast Health Center, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine Shanghai 200025, China.
Yi GuoDepartment of Electronic Engineering, Fudan University Shanghai 200433, China.
Yuanyuan WangDepartment of Electronic Engineering, Fudan University Shanghai 200433, China.
Xiaosong ChenDepartment of General Surgery, Comprehensive Breast Health Center, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine Shanghai 200025, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Triple negative breast cancer (TNBC) is a breast cancer subtype with unfavorable prognosis. We aimed to establish a machine learning-based ultrasound radiomics model to predict disease-free survival (DFS) in TNBC. Invasive TNBC>T1b between January 2009 and June 2018 with preoperative ultrasound were enrolled and assigned to training and independent test cohort. Radiomics and clinicopathological features related with DFS were selected by univariate and multivariate regression analysis. Training cohort of combined features was resampled with SMOTEENN to balance distribution and put into classifiers. Areas Under Curves (AUCs) of models were compared by DeLong's test. 562 women were included with 68 DFS events observed. Twenty prognostic radiomics features were extracted. Machine learning model by Naïve Bayes combining radiomics, clinicopathological features, and SMOTEENN had an AUC of 0.86 (95% CI 0.84-0.88), with sensitivity of 74.7% and specificity of 80.1% in training cohort. In independent test cohort, this three-combination model delivered an AUC of 0.90 (95% CI 0.83-0.95), higher than models based on radiomics (AUC=0.69, P=0.016) or radiomics + SMOTEENN (AUC=0.73, P=0.019). Integrating machine learning radiomics model based on ultrasound and clinicopathological features can predict DFS events for TNBC patients.

Indexed as

machine learningprognosisradiomicsTriple negative breast cancerultrasonography

Identifiers

PMID35141010
PMCPMC8822271

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.