Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35141008›Full record

ArticleAmerican journal of cancer research2022

De-glycosylated membrane PD-L1 in tumor tissues as a biomarker for responsiveness to atezolizumab (Tecentriq) in advanced breast cancer patients.

Fu Ou-Yang, Chung-Liang Li, Chia-Chi Chen, Yi-Chun Shen, Sin-Hua Moi, Chi-Wen Luo, Wei-Ya Xia, Ying-Nai Wang, Heng-Huan Lee, Lu-Hai Wang and 4 more

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in American journal of cancer research, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Immune evasion and resistance in breast cancer.American journal of cancer research · 2025
    Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Fu Ou-YangDivision of Breast Oncology and Surgery, Department of Surgery, Kaohsiung Medical University Hospital Kaohsiung 80756, Taiwan.
Chung-Liang LiDivision of Breast Oncology and Surgery, Department of Surgery, Kaohsiung Medical University Hospital Kaohsiung 80756, Taiwan.
Chia-Chi ChenDepartment of Pathology, E-Da Hospital and I-Shou University Kaohsiung 82445, Taiwan.
Yi-Chun ShenResearch Center for Cancer Biology, China Medical University Taichung 40402, Taiwan.
Sin-Hua MoiCenter of Cancer Program Development, E-Da Cancer Hospital, I-Shou University Kaohsiung 82445, Taiwan.
Chi-Wen LuoDivision of Breast Oncology and Surgery, Department of Surgery, Kaohsiung Medical University Hospital Kaohsiung 80756, Taiwan.
Wei-Ya XiaResearch Center for Cancer Biology, China Medical University Taichung 40402, Taiwan.
Ying-Nai WangDepartment of Molecular and Cellular Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center Houston, TX 77030, USA.
Heng-Huan LeeDepartment of Molecular and Cellular Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center Houston, TX 77030, USA.
Lu-Hai WangGraduate Institute of Integrated Medicine, China Medical University Taichung 40402, Taiwan.
Shao-Chun WangResearch Center for Cancer Biology, China Medical University Taichung 40402, Taiwan.
Mei-Ren PanGraduate Institute of Clinical Medicine, Kaohsiung Medical University Kaohsiung 80756, Taiwan.
Ming-Feng HouDivision of Breast Oncology and Surgery, Department of Surgery, Kaohsiung Medical University Hospital Kaohsiung 80756, Taiwan.
Mien-Chie HungResearch Center for Cancer Biology, China Medical University Taichung 40402, Taiwan.
Kaohsiung Medical University · TWThe University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center · USAsia University · TWChina Medical University · TWI-Shou University · TW

Funding

Dichotomous Effects of MT1-MMP on Adipose Tissue RemodelingR01DK109001 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS HLTH SCI CTR HOUSTON · PI SUN, KAI · 2017 to 2021
$2.0M
NIDDK NIH HHS R01 DK109001
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The atezolizumab (Tecentriq), a humanized antibody against human programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1), combined with nab-paclitaxel was granted with accelerated approval to treat unresectable locally advanced or metastatic triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) due to the encouraging positive results of the phase 3 IMpassion130 trial using PD-L1 biomarker from immune cells to stratify patients. However, the post-market study IMpassion131 did not support the original observation, resulting in the voluntary withdrawal of atezolizumab from the indication in breast cancer by Genentech in 2021. Emerging evidence has revealed a high frequency of false negative result using the standard immunohistochemical (IHC) staining due to heavy glycosylation of PD-L1. The removal of glycosylation prevents from the false negative staining, enabling more accurate assessment of PD-L1 levels and improving prediction for response to immune checkpoint therapy. In the present study, the natural and de-glycosylated PD-L1 expression in tumor and immune cells from nine TNBC patients were analyzed by using clone 28-8 monoclonal antibody to correlate with treatment outcome. Our results demonstrate that: (1) Removal of the glycosylation indeed enhances the detection of PD-L1 by IHC staining, (2) The PD-L1 levels on tumor cell surface after removal of the glycosylation correlates well with clinical responses for atezolizumab treatment; (3) The criteria used in the IMpassion130 and IMpassion131 trials which scored the natural PD-L1 in the immune cells failed to correlate with the clinical response. Taken together, tumor cell surface staining of PD-L1 with de-glycosylation has a significant correlation with the clinical response for atezolizumab treatment, suggesting that treatment of atezolizumab may be worthy of further consideration with de-glycosylation procedure as a patient stratification strategy. A larger cohort to validate this important issue is warranted to ensure right patient population who could benefit from the existing FDA-approved drugs.

Indexed as

atezolizumabglycosylationImmune checkpointPD-L1Tecentriqtriple-negative breast cancer

Identifiers

PMID35141008
PMCPMC8822291
OpenAlexW4211266945

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.