Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35140983›Full record

ArticleActa radiologica open2021

Intra- and inter-rater reliability of compressed breast thickness, applied force, and pressure distribution in screening mammography.

Martina Voigt, Anetta Bolejko, Magnus Dustler

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Acta radiologica open, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Martina VoigtDiagnostic Radiology, Department of Translational Medicine, Lund University, Skåne University Hospital, Malmö, Sweden.
Anetta BolejkoDiagnostic Radiology, Department of Translational Medicine, Lund University, Skåne University Hospital, Malmö, Sweden.
Magnus DustlerDiagnostic Radiology, Department of Translational Medicine, Lund University, Skåne University Hospital, Malmö, Sweden.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5699-9664

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundEnsuring equivalent and reproducible breast compression between mammographic screening rounds is important for the diagnostic performance of mammography, yet the extent to which screening mammography positioning and compression is reproducible for the individual woman is unknown. PURPOSE: To investigate the intra- and inter-rater reliability of breast compression in screening mammography. MATERIALS AND

methodsEleven breast-healthy women participated in the study. Two experienced radiographers independently positioned and compressed the breasts of each participant in two projections-right craniocaudal and left mediolateral oblique-and at two time points. The spatial pressure distribution on the compressed breast was measured using a pressure sensor matrix. Applied force, compressed breast thickness, force in field of view, contact area, mean pressure, and center of mass (anterio-posterior and mediolateral axes) were measured. The reliabilities of the measures between the time points for each radiographer (intra-rater reliability) and between the radiographers (inter-rater reliability) were analyzed using the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC).

resultsIntra- and inter-rater reliabilities from both projections demonstrated good to excellent ICCs (≥0.82) for compressed breast thickness, contact area, and anterio-posterior center of mass. The other measures produced ICCs that varied from poor (≤0.42) to excellent (≥0.93) between time points and between radiographers.

conclusionIntra- and inter-rater reliability of breast compression was consistently high for

Indexed as

breast compressionradiographerradiographyreliabilityScreening mammography

Identifiers

PMID35140983
PMCPMC8819760

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.