Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35140882›Full record

ReviewComputational and structural biotechnology journal2022

The emerging potential of microbiome transplantation on human health interventions.

Howard Junca, Dietmar H Pieper, Eva Medina

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Computational and structural biotechnology journal, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
5.4field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 42 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Trimethylamine-Annals of medicine · 2025
    Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. The Microbiota-Human Health Axis.Microorganisms · 2025
    Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. A Wall Fragment ofPharmaceutics · 2023
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Howard JuncaMicrobial Interactions and Processes Research Group, Helmholtz-Zentrum für Infektionsforschung, Braunschweig, Germany.
Dietmar H PieperMicrobial Interactions and Processes Research Group, Helmholtz-Zentrum für Infektionsforschung, Braunschweig, Germany.
Eva MedinaInfection Immunology Research Group, Helmholtz-Zentrum für Infektionsforschung, Braunschweig, Germany.
Helmholtz Centre for Infection Research · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The human microbiome has been the subject of intense research over the past few decades, in particular as a promising area for new clinical interventions. The microbiota colonizing the different body surfaces are of benefit for multiple physiological and metabolic processes of the human host and increasing evidence suggests an association between disturbances in the composition and functionality of the microbiota and several pathological conditions. This has provided a rationale for beneficial modulation of the microbiome. One approach being explored for modulating the microbiota in diseased individuals is transferring microbiota or microbiota constituents from healthy donors via microbiome transplantation. The great success of fecal microbiome transplantation for the treatment of

Indexed as

DysbiosisMicrobiome transplantationMicrobiota

Identifiers

PMID35140882
PMCPMC8801967
OpenAlexW4206650254

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.