Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35140850›Full record

ReviewIndian journal of orthopaedics2022

Dual-Plating in Distal Femur Fracture: A Systematic Review and Limited Meta-analysis.

Sujit Kumar Tripathy, Narayan Prasad Mishra, Paulson Varghese, Sibasish Panigrahi, Prabhudev Prasad Purudappa, Akshay Goel, Ramesh Kumar Sen

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Indian journal of orthopaedics, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.9field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 50 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Comparison of nail-plate and double-plate fixation in primary and periprosthetic distal femur fractures in older adults.Ulusal travma ve acil cerrahi dergisi = Turkish journal of trauma & emergency surgery : TJTES · 2026
    Article
  4. Observational
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. No cost difference between single or dual implants for distal femur fractures in the perioperative period.European journal of orthopaedic surgery & traumatology : orthopedie traumatologie · 2025
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Sujit Kumar TripathyDepartment of Orthopedics, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Bhubaneswar, 751019 India.ORCID 0000-0003-0179-9910
Narayan Prasad MishraDepartment of Orthopedics, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Bhubaneswar, 751019 India.ORCID 0000-0002-0887-1690
Paulson VargheseDepartment of Orthopedics, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Bhubaneswar, 751019 India.ORCID 0000-0002-2323-4980
Sibasish PanigrahiDepartment of Orthopedics, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Bhubaneswar, 751019 India.ORCID 0000-0003-1339-2405
Prabhudev Prasad PurudappaDepartment of Orthopedics, Boston VA Medical Centre, 150 S Huntington Avenue, Boston, MA 02130 USA.
Akshay GoelJoan C Edwards School of Medicine, Marshall University, Huntington, WV USA.
Ramesh Kumar SenDepartment of Orthopaedics, Max Hospital, Mohali, India.ORCID 0000-0002-2428-1105
All India Institute of Medical Sciences Bhubaneswar · INBoston University · USMarshall University · USMax Healthcare · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionAlthough lateral locking plate has shown promising results in distal femur fracture, there are high rates of varus collapse and implant failure in comminuted metaphyseal and articular fractures. This systematic review evaluates the functional outcomes and complications of dual plating in the distal femur fracture. MATERIALS AND

methodsManual and electronic search of databases (PubMed, Medline Embase and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials) was performed to retrieve studies on dual plate fixation in the distal femur fracture. Of the retrieved 925 articles, 12 were included after screening.

resultsThere were one randomized-controlled, four prospective and seven retrospective studies. A total of 287 patients with 292 knees were evaluated (dual plating 213, single plating 76, lost to follow-up 3). The nonunion and delayed union rates following dual plate fixations were up to 12.5% and 33.3%, respectively. The mean healing time ranged from 11 weeks to 18 months. Good to excellent outcome was observed in 55-75% patients. There was no difference between the single plate and dual plate fixation with regards to the functional outcomes (VAS score, Neer Score and Kolmert's standard) and complications. Pooled analysis of the studies revealed a longer surgical duration (MD - 16.84, 95% CI - 25.34, - 8.35,

conclusionDual plating leads to a satisfactory union in the comminuted metaphyseal and articular fractures of the distal femur. There is no difference between the single plate and dual plate with regards to nonunion rate, blood loss, functional outcomes and complications. However, dual fixation leads to faster fracture healing at the cost of a longer surgical duration.

Indexed as

Comminution; metaphysisDistal femur plateDouble plateLocking plateMedial platePeriprosthetic fractureSupracondylar femur fracture

Identifiers

PMID35140850
PMCPMC8789962
OpenAlexW3195509585

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.