Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35140783›Full record

ReviewGastroenterology research and practice2022

Fecal Microbiota Transplants for Inflammatory Bowel Disease Treatment: Synthetic- and Engineered Communities-Based Microbiota Transplants Are the Future.

Raees Khan, Nazish Roy, Hussain Ali, Muhammad Naeem

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Gastroenterology research and practice, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
30citing papers in PubMed
3.3field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

30 citing papers in PubMed, 34 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Gastrointestinal tract, its pathophysiology andWorld journal of gastroenterology · 2025
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Gut Microbiota and New Microbiome-Targeted Drugs forAntibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Review
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Raees KhanDepartment of Biological Sciences, National University of Medical Sciences, Rawalpindi 46000, Pakistan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8324-5702
Nazish RoySchool of Life Sciences, Forman Christian College (A Chartered University), Lahore 54600, Pakistan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4098-7316
Hussain AliDepartment of Pharmacy, Quaid-I-Azam University, Islamabad 45320, Pakistan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7486-5590
Muhammad NaeemDepartment of Biological Sciences, National University of Medical Sciences, Rawalpindi 46000, Pakistan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4868-5390
National University of Medical Sciences · PKForman Christian College · PKQuaid-i-Azam University · PK

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The human intestine harbors a huge number of diverse microorganisms where a variety of complex interactions take place between the microbes as well as the host and gut microbiota. Significant long-term variations in the gut microbiota (dysbiosis) have been associated with a variety of health conditions including inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). Conventional fecal microbiota transplantations (FMTs) have been utilized to treat IBD and have been proved promising. However, various limitations such as transient results, pathogen transfer, storage, and reproducibility render conventional FMT less safe and less sustainable. Defined synthetic microbial communities (SynCom) have been used to dissect the host-microbiota-associated functions using gnotobiotic animals or

Identifiers

PMID35140783
PMCPMC8820897
OpenAlexW4210490618

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.