Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35140701›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in immunology2021

A Diagnostic Model With IgM Autoantibodies and Carcinoembryonic Antigen for Early Detection of Lung Adenocarcinoma.

Xue Zhang, Jiaqi Li, Yulin Wang, Man Liu, Fenghui Liu, Xiuzhi Zhang, Lu Pei, Tingting Wang, Di Jiang, Xiao Wang and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in immunology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
5.0field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 37 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Effects of Oregano Essential Oil on IgAAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2023
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Xue ZhangHenan Institute of Medical and Pharmaceutical Sciences & School of Basic Medical Sciences, Academy of Medical Science, Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, China.
Jiaqi LiHenan Institute of Medical and Pharmaceutical Sciences & School of Basic Medical Sciences, Academy of Medical Science, Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, China.
Yulin WangHenan Institute of Medical and Pharmaceutical Sciences & School of Basic Medical Sciences, Academy of Medical Science, Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, China.
Man LiuHenan Institute of Medical and Pharmaceutical Sciences & School of Basic Medical Sciences, Academy of Medical Science, Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, China.
Fenghui LiuDepartment of Respiratory and Sleep Medicine in the First Affiliated Hospital, Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, China.
Xiuzhi ZhangDepartment of Pathology, Henan Medical College, Zhengzhou, China.
Lu PeiDepartment of Clinical Laboratory, Zhengzhou Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Zhengzhou, China.
Tingting WangDepartment of Clinical Laboratory, Fuwai Central China Cardiovascular Hospital, Zhengzhou, China.
Di JiangHenan Institute of Medical and Pharmaceutical Sciences & School of Basic Medical Sciences, Academy of Medical Science, Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, China.
Xiao WangHenan Institute of Medical and Pharmaceutical Sciences & School of Basic Medical Sciences, Academy of Medical Science, Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, China.
Jianying ZhangHenan Institute of Medical and Pharmaceutical Sciences & School of Basic Medical Sciences, Academy of Medical Science, Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, China.
Liping DaiHenan Institute of Medical and Pharmaceutical Sciences & School of Basic Medical Sciences, Academy of Medical Science, Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, China.
Zhengzhou University · CNFirst Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University · CNNanyang Medical College · CNZhengzhou Central Hospital · CNZhengzhou City Hospital · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Immunoglobulin M (IgM) autoantibodies, as the early appearing antibodies in humoral immunity when stimulated by antigens, might be excellent biomarkers for the early detection of lung cancer (LC). We aimed to develop a multi-analyte integrative model combining IgM autoantibodies and a traditional tumor biomarker that could be a valuable and powerful auxiliary diagnostic tool and might improve the accuracy of early detection of lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD). A customized protein array based on cancer driver genes was constructed and applied in the discovery cohort consisting of 68 LUAD patients and 68 normal controls (NCs); 31 differentially expressed IgM autoantibodies were identified. The top 5 candidate IgM autoantibodies [based on the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) ranking], namely, TSHR, ERBB2, survivin, PIK3CA, and JAK2, were validated in the validation cohort using enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA), which included 147 LUAD samples, 72 lung squamous cell carcinoma (LUSC) samples, 44 small cell lung carcinoma (SCLC) samples, and 147 NCs. These indicators presented diagnostic capacity for LUAD, with AUCs of 0.599, 0.613, 0.579, 0.601, and 0.633, respectively (

Indexed as

Adenocarcinoma of LungAdultAgedAged, 80 and overAntigens, NeoplasmAutoantibodiesBiomarkers, TumorCarcinoembryonic AntigenCarcinoma, Squamous CellEarly Detection of CancerFemaleHumansImmunoglobulin MLung NeoplasmsMaleMiddle AgedAntigens, NeoplasmAutoantibodiesBiomarkers, TumorCarcinoembryonic AntigenImmunoglobulin Mcancer driver genecarcinoembryonic antigen (CEA)diagnostic modelIgM autoantibodylung adenocarcinoma (LUAD)protein array

Identifiers

PMID35140701
PMCPMC8818794
OpenAlexW4206933525

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.