Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35140599›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in aging neuroscience2021

An Iterative Method for Predicting Essential Proteins Based on Multifeature Fusion and Linear Neighborhood Similarity.

Xianyou Zhu, Yaocan Zhu, Yihong Tan, Zhiping Chen, Lei Wang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in aging neuroscience, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Xianyou ZhuCollege of Computer Science and Technology, Hengyang Normal University, Hengyang, China.
Yaocan ZhuCollege of Computer Engineering and Applied Mathematics, Changsha University, Changsha, China.
Yihong TanCollege of Computer Engineering and Applied Mathematics, Changsha University, Changsha, China.
Zhiping ChenCollege of Computer Science and Technology, Hengyang Normal University, Hengyang, China.
Lei WangCollege of Computer Engineering and Applied Mathematics, Changsha University, Changsha, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Growing evidence have demonstrated that many biological processes are inseparable from the participation of key proteins. In this paper, a novel iterative method called linear neighborhood similarity-based protein multifeatures fusion (LNSPF) is proposed to identify potential key proteins based on multifeature fusion. In LNSPF, an original protein-protein interaction (PPI) network will be constructed first based on known protein-protein interaction data downloaded from benchmark databases, based on which, topological features will be further extracted. Next, gene expression data of proteins will be adopted to transfer the original PPI network to a weighted PPI network based on the linear neighborhood similarity. After that, subcellular localization and homologous information of proteins will be integrated to extract functional features for proteins, and based on both functional and topological features obtained above. And then, an iterative method will be designed and carried out to predict potential key proteins. At last, for evaluating the predictive performance of LNSPF, extensive experiments have been done, and compare results between LNPSF and 15 state-of-the-art competitive methods have demonstrated that LNSPF can achieve satisfactory recognition accuracy, which is markedly better than that achieved by each competing method.

Indexed as

entropyiterative methodkey proteinlinear neighborhood similaritymulti-feature fusion

Identifiers

PMID35140599
PMCPMC8819145

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.