Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35140514›Full record

ArticleJournal of pain research2022

Effects of Lidocaine on Motor-Evoked Potentials and Somatosensory-Evoked Potentials in Patients Undergoing Intraspinal Tumour Resection: Study Protocol for a Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial.

Hongli Yue, Man Zhou, Yingzi Chong, Miao Cheng, Hui Qiao, Yu Lu, Weihua Cui

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of pain research, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 51% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Hongli Yue *Department of Anesthesiology, Beijing Tian Tan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, People's Republic of China.
Man Zhou *Department of Anesthesiology, Beijing Children's Hospital, Capital Medical University, National Center for Children's Health, Beijing, People's Republic of China.ORCID 0000-0002-1464-8882
Yingzi ChongDepartment of Anesthesiology, Beijing Tian Tan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, People's Republic of China.
Miao ChengDepartment of Anesthesiology, Beijing Tian Tan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, People's Republic of China.ORCID 0000-0002-2028-4982
Hui QiaoDepartment of Neurophysiology, Beijing Neurosurgical Institute, Capital Medical University, Beijing, People's Republic of China.
Yu LuDepartment of Anesthesiology, Beijing Tian Tan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, People's Republic of China.
Weihua CuiDepartment of Anesthesiology, Beijing Tian Tan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, People's Republic of China.ORCID 0000-0003-0893-3991
Capital Medical University · CNBeijing Institute of Neurosurgery · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeAt present, it is believed that intravenous (IV) infusion of lidocaine can inhibit hyperalgesia, relieve postoperative acute and chronic pain, and accelerate the rehabilitation of patients. However, studies of its effects on necessary electrophysiological monitoring during neurosurgery are few, and the results are controversial. This study assumes that the propofol-remifentanil based anaesthesia combined with lidocaine in patients undergoing intraspinal tumour resection will not have adverse effects on motor-evoked potentials (MEPs) or somatosensory-evoked potentials (SEPs). STUDY DESIGN AND

methodsThis is a prospective, randomized, placebo-controlled double-blind trial. A total of 96 patients undergoing intraspinal tumour resection will be randomly allocated to lidocaine and placebo group. The lidocaine group will receive IV lidocaine during anaesthesia, while the placebo group will receive the same dose of normal saline with the same infusion rate and infusion time, and the anaesthesia procedures of the two groups will be the same. All patients will be monitored the MEPs and SEPs of all four limbs during operation. The primary outcome will be the MEP amplitudes of both upper limbs at the end of operation. The secondary outcome measures will be the other electrophysiological parameters at the end of operation, the incidence of alert events for all four limbs, and the incidence of false positive events. DISCUSSION: The purpose of this study is to evaluate the effects of IV infusion of lidocaine on SEPs and MEPs during intraspinal tumour resection to determine whether electrophysiological monitoring can accurately reflect the integrity of nerve functions while infusing lidocaine and to explore the possibility of lidocaine use during intraspinal tumour resection as an anaesthesia option.

Indexed as

intraspinal tumour resectionlidocainemotor-evoked potentialssomatosensory-evoked potentials

Identifiers

PMID35140514
PMCPMC8818774
OpenAlexW4210821007

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.