Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35140507›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of general medicine2022

Biomechanical Effects of Pedicle Screw Positioning on the Surgical Segment in Models After Oblique Lumbar Interbody Fusion: An in-silico Study.

Chen Xu, Chenyi Huang, Ping Cai, Zhongxin Fang, Zhangchao Wei, Fei Liu, Jingchi Li, Yang Liu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of general medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Chen Xu *Department of Spine Surgery, Shanghai Changzheng Hospital, Naval Medical University, Shanghai, 200003, People's Republic of China.
Chenyi Huang *Department of Orthopedics, Hospital (T.C.M) Affiliated to Southwest Medical University, Luzhou, 646000, Sichuan, People's Republic of China.
Ping CaiDepartment of Orthopedics, Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing University of Chinese Medicine, Nanjing, Jiangsu, People's Republic of China.
Zhongxin FangFluid and Power Machinery Key Laboratory of Ministry of Education, Xihua University, Chengdu, People's Republic of China.
Zhangchao WeiDepartment of Orthopedics, Hospital (T.C.M) Affiliated to Southwest Medical University, Luzhou, 646000, Sichuan, People's Republic of China.
Fei LiuDepartment of Orthopedics, Hospital (T.C.M) Affiliated to Southwest Medical University, Luzhou, 646000, Sichuan, People's Republic of China.
Jingchi LiDepartment of Spine Surgery, Shanghai Changzheng Hospital, Naval Medical University, Shanghai, 200003, People's Republic of China.
Yang LiuDepartment of Spine Surgery, Shanghai Changzheng Hospital, Naval Medical University, Shanghai, 200003, People's Republic of China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundBilateral pedicle screw (BPS) is the "gold standard" of fixation methods for patients with lumbar interbody fusion. Biomechanical deterioration initially triggers complications in the surgical segment. Studies proved that BPS positions and trajectory changes affect the local biomechanical environment. However, no study illustrates the biomechanical effect of insertional screw positions' change on the surgical segment.

methodsOblique lumbar interbody fusion (OLIF) with different BPS insertional positions has been simulated in a well-validated lumbo-sacral model. Fixation stability and stress responses on the surgical segment were evaluated under identical loading conditions.

resultsThere is no clear variation tendency for the risk of BPS failure and the change of strain energy density of the grafted bone. However, shifting the insertional screw position close to the surgical segment will increase the range of motions (ROM) in the surgical segment and lead to stress concentration of bony structures, especially in the caudal side of the surgical segment.

conclusionAdjusting the insertional position of BPS close to the surgical segment in OLIF models will lead to stress concentration of bony structures and surgical segmental instability. Therefore, reducing BPS's fixation length was not recommended, which may increase the risk of segmental instability, non-union, and cage subsidence.

Indexed as

bilateral pedicle screwcage subsidenceinsertional screw positionsnon-unionoblique lumbar interbody fusion

Identifiers

PMID35140507
PMCPMC8818966

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.