ArticleInternational journal of general medicine2022
Comparison of Two Predictive Models of Sepsis in Critically Ill Patients Based on the Combined Use of Inflammatory Markers.
Article in International journal of general medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- An externally validated prognostic model for critically ill patients with traumatic brain injury.Annals of clinical and translational neurology · 2024Article
- The Potential Role of Neutrophil-Reactive Intensity (NEUT-RI) in the Diagnosis of Sepsis in Critically Ill Patients: A Retrospective Cohort Study.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- An Analysis of Predictive Factors for Severe Neonatal Infection and the Construction of a Prediction Model.Infection and drug resistance · 2023Article
- Discriminatory capacity of serum interleukin-6 between complicated and uncomplicated acute appendicitis in children: a prospective validation study.World journal of pediatrics : WJP · 2022Observational
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundSepsis is a systemic inflammatory response due to infection, resulting in organ dysfunction. Timely targeted interventions can improve prognosis. Inflammation plays a crucial role in the process of sepsis. To identify potential sepsis early, we developed and validated a nomogram model and a simple risk scoring model for predicting sepsis in critically ill patients.
methodsThe medical records of adult patients admitted to our intensive care unit (ICU) from August 2017 to December 2020 were analyzed. Patients were randomly divided into a training cohort (70%) and a validation cohort (30%). A nomogram model was developed through multivariate logistic regression analysis. The continuous variables included in nomogram model were transformed into dichotomous variables. Then, a multivariable logistic regression analysis was performed based on these dichotomous variables, and the odds ratio (OR) for each variable was used to construct a simple risk scoring model. The receiver operating characteristic curves (ROC) were constructed, and the area under the curve (AUC) was calculated.
resultsA total of 2074 patients were enrolled. Finally, white blood cell (WBC), C-reactive protein (CRP), interleukin-6 (IL-6), procalcitonin (PCT) and neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) were included in our models. The AUC of the nomogram model and the simple risk scoring model were 0.854 and 0.842, respectively. The prediction performance of the two models on sepsis is comparable (p = 0.1298).
conclusionThis study combining five commonly available inflammatory markers (WBC, CRP, IL-6, PCT and NLR) developed a nomogram model and a simple risk scoring model to predict sepsis in critically ill patients. Although the prediction performance of the two models is comparable, the simple risk scoring model may be simpler and more practical for clinicians to identify potential sepsis in critically ill patients at an early stage and strategize treatments.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.