Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35140460›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease

Challenges and Strategies for Improving COPD Primary Care Services in Quebec: Results of the Experience of the COMPAS+ Quality Improvement Collaborative.

Brigitte Vachon, Guylaine Giasson, Isabelle Gaboury, Dina Gaid, Véronique Noël De Tilly, Lise Houle, Jean Bourbeau, Marie-Pascale Pomey

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
8.3field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 30 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 8 institutions in 1 country.

Brigitte VachonSchool of Rehabilitation, Faculty of Medicine, Université de Montréal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.ORCID 0000-0003-2899-2120
Guylaine GiassonCentre de recherche Charles-Le Moyne, Longueuil, Quebec, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-1308-9601
Isabelle GabouryCentre de recherche Charles-Le Moyne, Longueuil, Quebec, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-2881-4714
Dina GaidSchool of Rehabilitation, Faculty of Medicine, Université de Montréal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.ORCID 0000-0003-3419-941X
Véronique Noël De TillyConvergence Santé, Montreal, Québec, Canada.
Lise HouleInstitut national d'excellence en santé et en services sociaux (INESSS), Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
Jean BourbeauCenter of Innovative Medicine, Research Institute of the McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
Marie-Pascale PomeyPublic Health School, Department of Management, Evaluation and Health Policy, Faculty of Medicine, Université de Montréal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.ORCID 0000-0001-5180-8139
Centre Hospitalier de l’Université de Montréal · CACentre Intégré Universitaire de Santé et de Services Sociaux du Centre-Sud-de-l'Île-de-Montréal · CAHôpital Charles-Le Moyne · CAInstitut National d'Excellence en Santé et en Services Sociaux · CAMcGill University Health Centre · CASante Montreal · CAUniversité de Montréal · CAUniversité de Sherbrooke · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionManagement of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) remains a challenge in primary care and multiple barriers can limit implementation of COPD guidelines. Since 2016, a quality improvement (QI) collaborative, called COMPAS+, has been implemented across the province of Quebec (Canada) to support improvement of chronic disease management in primary care. The aim of this study was to describe the main COPD quality problems reported by participating teams and the strategies they proposed and implemented to improve COPD primary care services in Quebec.

methodsSixteen sites in four different regions of Quebec were engaged in the COMPAS+ intervention to improve primary care services delivered to people living with COPD. A total of 14 workshop reports, 31 QI action plans and 4 regional final reports underwent content analysis. Key COPD quality problems were first identified and, for each of them, root causes were classified according to the domains and constructs of the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research. Proposed strategies were organized according to the intervention function types described in the Behavior Change Wheel.

resultsFour key COPD quality problems were identified: 1) lack of organization/coordination of COPD services, 2) lack of screening services coordination, 3) lack of interprofessional communication and collaboration and 4) lack of treatment adherence. Main root causes explaining these quality gaps were 1) lack of awareness of COPD, 2) lack of professional knowledge, 3) lack of definition of professional roles, 4) lack of resources and tools for COPD prevention, diagnosis, and follow-up, 5) lack of communication tools, 6) lack of integration of the patient-as-partner approach, and 7) lack of adaptation of patient education to their specific needs. Multiple strategies were proposed to improve healthcare professionals' education and interprofessional collaboration and communication.

conclusionQI collaborative activities can support achieving understanding of QI challenges healthcare organizations face to improve COPD services.

Indexed as

Pulmonary Disease, Chronic ObstructiveQuality ImprovementChronic DiseaseHumansPrimary Health CareQuebecCOPDinterprofessional collaborationprimary carequality improvement collaborativequality of care

Identifiers

PMID35140460
PMCPMC8819163
OpenAlexW4210390111

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.