Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35140318›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2022

A promising deep learning-assistive algorithm for histopathological screening of colorectal cancer.

Cowan Ho, Zitong Zhao, Xiu Fen Chen, Jan Sauer, Sahil Ajit Saraf, Rajasa Jialdasani, Kaveh Taghipour, Aneesh Sathe, Li-Yan Khor, Kiat-Hon Lim and 1 more

Abstract readValidation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 40 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
40citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

40 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Predicting liver metastasis in colorectal cancer patients using routine biochemical tests enhanced by machine learning.Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2026
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Cowan Ho *Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University Singapore, Singapore, Singapore.
Zitong Zhao *Department of Anatomical Pathology, Singapore General Hospital, 20 College Road, Singapore, 169856, Singapore.
Xiu Fen Chen *Department of Anatomical Pathology, Singapore General Hospital, 20 College Road, Singapore, 169856, Singapore.
Jan SauerQritive Pte. Ltd., Singapore, Singapore.
Sahil Ajit SarafQritive Pte. Ltd., Singapore, Singapore.
Rajasa JialdasaniQritive Pte. Ltd., Singapore, Singapore.
Kaveh TaghipourQritive Pte. Ltd., Singapore, Singapore.
Aneesh SatheQritive Pte. Ltd., Singapore, Singapore.
Li-Yan KhorDepartment of Anatomical Pathology, Singapore General Hospital, 20 College Road, Singapore, 169856, Singapore.
Kiat-Hon LimDepartment of Anatomical Pathology, Singapore General Hospital, 20 College Road, Singapore, 169856, Singapore.
Wei-Qiang LeowDepartment of Anatomical Pathology, Singapore General Hospital, 20 College Road, Singapore, 169856, Singapore. leow.wei.qiang@singhealth.com.sg.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Colorectal cancer is one of the most common cancers worldwide, accounting for an annual estimated 1.8 million incident cases. With the increasing number of colonoscopies being performed, colorectal biopsies make up a large proportion of any histopathology laboratory workload. We trained and validated a unique artificial intelligence (AI) deep learning model as an assistive tool to screen for colonic malignancies in colorectal specimens, in order to improve cancer detection and classification; enabling busy pathologists to focus on higher order decision-making tasks. The study cohort consists of Whole Slide Images (WSI) obtained from 294 colorectal specimens. Qritive's unique composite algorithm comprises both a deep learning model based on a Faster Region Based Convolutional Neural Network (Faster-RCNN) architecture for instance segmentation with a ResNet-101 feature extraction backbone that provides glandular segmentation, and a classical machine learning classifier. The initial training used pathologists' annotations on a cohort of 66,191 image tiles extracted from 39 WSIs. A subsequent application of a classical machine learning-based slide classifier sorted the WSIs into 'low risk' (benign, inflammation) and 'high risk' (dysplasia, malignancy) categories. We further trained the composite AI-model's performance on a larger cohort of 105 resections WSIs and then validated our findings on a cohort of 150 biopsies WSIs against the classifications of two independently blinded pathologists. We evaluated the area under the receiver-operator characteristic curve (AUC) and other performance metrics. The AI model achieved an AUC of 0.917 in the validation cohort, with excellent sensitivity (97.4%) in detection of high risk features of dysplasia and malignancy. We demonstrate an unique composite AI-model incorporating both a glandular segmentation deep learning model and a classical machine learning classifier, with excellent sensitivity in picking up high risk colorectal features. As such, AI plays a role as a potential screening tool in assisting busy pathologists by outlining the dysplastic and malignant glands.

Indexed as

Area Under CurveBiopsyColorectal NeoplasmsDeep LearningHumansImage Interpretation, Computer-AssistedMass ScreeningNeural Networks, ComputerPathology, ClinicalROC Curve

Identifiers

PMID35140318
PMCPMC8828883

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.