Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35140316›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2022

Co-occurrence CDK4/6 amplification serves as biomarkers of de novo EGFR TKI resistance in sensitizing EGFR mutation non-small cell lung cancer.

Piyada Sitthideatphaiboon, Chinachote Teerapakpinyo, Krittiya Korphaisarn, Nophol Leelayuwatanakul, Nopporn Pornpatrananrak, Naravat Poungvarin, Poonchavist Chantranuwat, Shanop Shuangshoti, Chatchawit Aporntewan, Wariya Chintanapakdee and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Piyada SitthideatphaiboonDivision of Medical Oncology, Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University and The King Chulalongkorn Memorial Hospital, Bangkok, 10330, Thailand.
Chinachote TeerapakpinyoChula GenePRO Center, Research Affairs, Chulalongkorn University and The King Chulalongkorn Memorial Hospital, Bangkok, 10330, Thailand.
Krittiya KorphaisarnDivision of Medical Oncology, Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University, Siriraj, Bangkok Noi, Bangkok, 10700, Thailand.
Nophol LeelayuwatanakulDivision of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University and The King Chulalongkorn Memorial Hospital, Bangkok, Thailand.
Nopporn PornpatrananrakDepartment of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University and The King Chulalongkorn Memorial Hospital, Bangkok, 10330, Thailand.
Naravat PoungvarinDepartment of Clinical Pathology, Faculty of Medicine Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University, Siriraj, Bangkok Noi, Bangkok, 10700, Thailand.
Poonchavist ChantranuwatDepartment of Pathology, Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University and The King Chulalongkorn Memorial Hospital, Bangkok, 10330, Thailand.
Shanop ShuangshotiChula GenePRO Center, Research Affairs, Chulalongkorn University and The King Chulalongkorn Memorial Hospital, Bangkok, 10330, Thailand.
Chatchawit AporntewanDepartment of Mathematics and Computer Science & Omics Science and Bioinformatics Center, Faculty of Science, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, 10330, Thailand.
Wariya ChintanapakdeeDepartment of Radiology, Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University and The King Chulalongkorn Memorial Hospital, Bangkok, Thailand.
Virote SriuranpongDivision of Medical Oncology, Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University and The King Chulalongkorn Memorial Hospital, Bangkok, 10330, Thailand.
Chanida VinayanuwattikunDivision of Medical Oncology, Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University and The King Chulalongkorn Memorial Hospital, Bangkok, 10330, Thailand. Chanida.Vi@chula.ac.th.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Despite the development of predictive biomarkers to shape treatment paradigms and outcomes, de novo EGFR TKI resistance advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) remains an issue of concern. We explored clinical factors in 332 advanced NSCLC who received EGFR TKI and molecular characteristics through 65 whole exome sequencing of various EGFR TKI responses including; de novo (progression within 3 months), intermediate response (IRs) and long-term response (LTRs) (durability > 2 years). Uncommon EGFR mutation subtypes were significantly variable enriched in de novo resistance. The remaining sensitizing EGFR mutation subtypes (exon 19 del and L858R) accounted for 75% of de novo resistance. Genomic landscape analysis was conducted, focusing in 10 frequent oncogenic signaling pathways with functional contributions; cell cycle, Hippo, Myc, Notch, Nrf2, PI-3-Kinase/Akt, RTK-RAS, TGF-β, p53 and β-catenin/Wnt signaling. Cell cycle pathway was the only significant alteration pathway among groups with the FDR p-value of 6 × 10

Indexed as

AgedAntineoplastic AgentsBiomarkersCarcinoma, Non-Small-Cell LungCyclin-Dependent Kinase 4Cyclin-Dependent Kinase 6Drug Resistance, NeoplasmErbB ReceptorsFemaleGene AmplificationGenes, erbB-1HumansLung NeoplasmsMaleMiddle AgedProgression-Free SurvivalAntineoplastic AgentsBiomarkersCDK4 protein, humanCDK6 protein, humanCyclin-Dependent Kinase 4Cyclin-Dependent Kinase 6EGFR protein, humanErbB ReceptorsProtein Kinase Inhibitors

Identifiers

PMID35140316
PMCPMC8828869

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.