Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35140277›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2022

Development and clinical application of a deep learning model to identify acute infarct on magnetic resonance imaging.

Christopher P Bridge, Bernardo C Bizzo, James M Hillis, John K Chin, Donnella S Comeau, Romane Gauriau, Fabiola Macruz, Jayashri Pawar, Flavia T C Noro, Elshaimaa Sharaf and 7 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Predicting Molecular Subtype and Survival of Rhabdomyosarcoma Patients Using Deep Learning of H&E Images: A Report from the Children's Oncology Group.Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research · 2023
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Christopher P Bridge *MGH & BWH Center for Clinical Data Science, Mass General Brigham, Boston, USA.
Bernardo C Bizzo *MGH & BWH Center for Clinical Data Science, Mass General Brigham, Boston, USA. bbizzo@mgh.harvard.edu.
James M HillisMGH & BWH Center for Clinical Data Science, Mass General Brigham, Boston, USA.
John K ChinMGH & BWH Center for Clinical Data Science, Mass General Brigham, Boston, USA.
Donnella S ComeauMGH & BWH Center for Clinical Data Science, Mass General Brigham, Boston, USA.
Romane GauriauMGH & BWH Center for Clinical Data Science, Mass General Brigham, Boston, USA.
Fabiola MacruzMGH & BWH Center for Clinical Data Science, Mass General Brigham, Boston, USA.
Jayashri PawarMGH & BWH Center for Clinical Data Science, Mass General Brigham, Boston, USA.
Flavia T C NoroMGH & BWH Center for Clinical Data Science, Mass General Brigham, Boston, USA.
Elshaimaa SharafMGH & BWH Center for Clinical Data Science, Mass General Brigham, Boston, USA.
Marcelo Straus TakahashiDiagnósticos da América SA, São Paulo, Brazil.
Bradley WrightMGH & BWH Center for Clinical Data Science, Mass General Brigham, Boston, USA.
John F KalafutGE Healthcare, Chicago, USA.
Katherine P AndrioleMGH & BWH Center for Clinical Data Science, Mass General Brigham, Boston, USA.
Stuart R PomerantzMGH & BWH Center for Clinical Data Science, Mass General Brigham, Boston, USA.
Stefano PedemonteMGH & BWH Center for Clinical Data Science, Mass General Brigham, Boston, USA.
R Gilberto GonzálezMGH & BWH Center for Clinical Data Science, Mass General Brigham, Boston, USA.
Mass General Brigham · USHarvard University · USDASA (Brazil)

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Stroke is a leading cause of death and disability. The ability to quickly identify the presence of acute infarct and quantify the volume on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) has important treatment implications. We developed a machine learning model that used the apparent diffusion coefficient and diffusion weighted imaging series. It was trained on 6,657 MRI studies from Massachusetts General Hospital (MGH; Boston, USA). All studies were labelled positive or negative for infarct (classification annotation) with 377 having the region of interest outlined (segmentation annotation). The different annotation types facilitated training on more studies while not requiring the extensive time to manually segment every study. We initially validated the model on studies sequestered from the training set. We then tested the model on studies from three clinical scenarios: consecutive stroke team activations for 6-months at MGH, consecutive stroke team activations for 6-months at a hospital that did not provide training data (Brigham and Women's Hospital [BWH]; Boston, USA), and an international site (Diagnósticos da América SA [DASA]; Brazil). The model results were compared to radiologist ground truth interpretations. The model performed better when trained on classification and segmentation annotations (area under the receiver operating curve [AUROC] 0.995 [95% CI 0.992-0.998] and median Dice coefficient for segmentation overlap of 0.797 [IQR 0.642-0.861]) compared to segmentation annotations alone (AUROC 0.982 [95% CI 0.972-0.990] and Dice coefficient 0.776 [IQR 0.584-0.857]). The model accurately identified infarcts for MGH stroke team activations (AUROC 0.964 [95% CI 0.943-0.982], 381 studies), BWH stroke team activations (AUROC 0.981 [95% CI 0.966-0.993], 247 studies), and at DASA (AUROC 0.998 [95% CI 0.993-1.000], 171 studies). The model accurately segmented infarcts with Pearson correlation comparing model output and ground truth volumes between 0.968 and 0.986 for the three scenarios. Acute infarct can be accurately detected and segmented on MRI in real-world clinical scenarios using a machine learning model.

Identifiers

PMID35140277
PMCPMC8828773
OpenAlexW4225638512

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.