Observational studyScientific reports2022
Ocular anterior segment and corneal parameters evaluation in celiac disease.
Observational study in Scientific reports, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- Ophthalmic manifestations of celiac disease in Tabuk City, Saudi Arabia.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
- Ocular Manifestations of Celiac Disease: Current Evidence and Clinical Implications.Nutrients · 2025Review
- Implications of Celiac Disease in Prospective Corneal Refractive Surgery Patients: A Narrative Review.Cureus · 2024Review
- Optical Coherence Tomography Analysis of Retinal Layers in Celiac Disease.Journal of clinical medicine · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This observational case-control study evaluated the anterior ocular segment parameters of patients with celiac disease with a Scheimpflug imaging system and compared them with those of a healthy controls group, highlighting potential differences related to the underlying pathogenetic mechanisms of the disease. Seventy celiac patients and 70 healthy subjects were assessed with a comprehensive ophthalmological evaluation, including clinical history, Snellen best-corrected visual acuity, axial length (AL) measurements with IOLMaster, and anterior segment tomographic evaluation with Pentacam HR. The measurements of all keratometry values, astigmatism, steep axis, anterior and posterior Q value (asphericity), pupil diameter, pupil center, corneal apex, the thinnest point, corneal volume, anterior chamber depth from the epithelium, anterior chamber depth from endothelium, anterior chamber volume, and iridocorneal angle were also appraised. The two study groups were comparable and similar for gender, age, and AL, with no statistically significant differences regarding all analyzed tomographic parameters. Thus, ocular anterior segment parameters of celiac patients are not significantly different from those of healthy subjects, suggesting no underlying pathogenetic implications of celiac disease affecting the assessed structures. Nevertheless, a routine ophthalmological examination for all celiac patients should be recommended throughout their lifetimes due to the potential ocular manifestations of the disease.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.